Thread regarding Ford layoffs

The day of the BEV is over before it got started

Hyundai Doosan to Scale Up H2 ICE Engines

https://www.wardsauto.com/industry-news/hyundai-doosan-scale-h2-ice-engines

In the U.S., the Biden Admin. signed the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) into law last August, which contains big incentives to build out hydrogen hubs across the U.S. to support a shift away from diesel to hydrogen over the next 10-15 years.
HDI’s hydrogen 11.0L ICE engine can produce 300 kW (402 HP) and 1,254 lb.-ft. (1,700 Nm) of torque at 2,000 rpm. Fulfilling Tier 5/Stage 5/Euro7 regulations, the engine’s emissions satisfy requirements by being 90% lower than the current level to meet Zero CO2 (below 1g/kwh) and Zero Impact Emission standards.

The engines are extremely suitable for road-going semi-trucks as well as construction equipment. They refill in one minute, and have a range of 310 miles (500 km). The engines also are 25%-30% more economical than battery packs or hydrogen fuel cells with maintenance costs factored in.

I'd rather be in this camp than the BEV dead end.

by
| 1123 views | | 14 replies (last ) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1p4xkMBY

14 replies (most recent on top)

Hydrogen requires far more electricity than battery electric vehicles. They also have limited ranges as the energy density, even under extremely high pressures, is not very good. Oh, and that hydrogen is quite expensive due to the energy needed to produce it and you can only buy it from a filling station.

No thanks.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @4gdv+1p4xkMBY

@3xkz anyone who writes “y’all” needs an education on communication skills.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @3tdc+1p4xkMBY

Former President George W. Bush promoted the hydrogen alternative y'all are discussing. It went nowhere, rejected. What makes y'all think it would be accepted now?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @3xkc+1p4xkMBY

@1sjf+1p4xkMBY the major reason why countries don't want to use nuclear is because a lot of it is extremely efficient.
so that means less money can be extracted from people because of it.

some submarines are nuclear powered and require refuelling every 20 years or so.

you can't make more money from something efficient like that.
if people actually want green energy. we would have to ditch all this inefficient, low durability and expensive alternatives and go straight to nuclear.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @3btc+1p4xkMBY

Thermodynamics lesson,

Energy out = energy in + losses due to entropy

To derive energy from burning hydrogen gas, it must be made available as H2 by separating from oxygen with energy.

Time and pressure have done much of the work for us in providing us with fossil fuels from available shale oil, gas and crude oil (“dinosaur sauce”)

Solar , wind, renewables, are possible, to provide maybe 25% (upper limit) depending on sunlight and wind conditions and additional significant investment in technology and storage costs.

We are gonna need nuclear energy after all. Sorry Greenpeace.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1sjf+1p4xkMBY

kaboom...that blowed up real good...

By reasonable sized vehicle and drive less.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1bld+1p4xkMBY

UAW should be walking "Hydrogen is the future" placards on the picket line!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @fde+1p4xkMBY

rxr+1 seems to be betting against the US Government and the hydrogen hubs.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @hjd+1p4xkMBY

Hindenburg? That was in 1937. I think we progressed a bit since then - but good try on a Friday the 13th to scare people! H2 is way better than digging up 250 tons of ore to make a single battery pack lol.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @nrf+1p4xkMBY

If you work iin this industry, this is the path towards keeping your job!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @cou+1p4xkMBY

I'll say it again, BEV time has come and I am pleased that Ford Model e is going all in. Just look at the success of Tesla. They got a head start on us but Ford will catch up quickly. The transformation plan already shows that path.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @rxr+1p4xkMBY

https://www.cnbc.com/2023/10/13/bidens-hydrogen-hubs-will-get-7-billion-california-houston-more.html

Looks like there's a better way!

There are MANY ways to make hydrogen. LOL, self igniting batteries are not risky though.

Look, there are super heat patented hydrogen production plants that can make copious amounts of it and exist today. Do some research on nuke plant extensibility. Yep Elon could see Tesla in a big hurt with a few billion in R&D to make, store it, use H2 with safety.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ggr+1p4xkMBY

Yeah, where do you get hydrogen. The most common form is H2O…

you need energy to break the bonds between H and O… the. Glue them back together somehow.

Simple chemistry.

Safe storage of compressed or liquified hydrogen is another whole matter. It tends to leak out as it is a tiny molecule. Cant store/park it in your garage or you will have a Hindenburg type of risky situation.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @nkr+1p4xkMBY

Elon says hydrogen is a waste. The energy it takes to produce makes it not efficient.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @txk+1p4xkMBY

Post a reply

: