Thread regarding Wells Fargo & Co. layoffs

Remote plus customer facing

Safe(r)?

by
| 1146 views | | 6 replies (last ) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1qUryRCD

6 replies (most recent on top)

I like toast sounds good to me

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2nob+1qUryRCD

You're not safe at all. Give your not within a controlled property, you're a target in 2 weeks.

If I were you, I would begin saying your good bye's......dude you're f'ing toast.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2qjy+1qUryRCD

Literally no one is safe. And not in the traditional sense of American capitalism, no, at WF you can never presume that the decisions made at the top are even good for the company's bottom line. Shart doesn't care about WF and never did. He's here to wind it down, and that's exactly what he's doing. Getting rid of the absolute max number of US workers is phase 1.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1zql+1qUryRCD

needs to be face to face customer facing or direct in-branch support. no phone customer work qualifies

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @gnz+1qUryRCD

No one is safe.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @thc+1qUryRCD

You must not be customer facing in the traditional sense, which is what the company refers to.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @lbk+1qUryRCD

Post a reply

: