Thread regarding Bank of New York Mellon Corp. layoffs

They have nowhere to go but down

Does anyone disagree? I can only speak from my experience in Asset Servicing, but BNYM's business model reflects more of a commodity than a service. What can they really add to the table that separates them from competitors?

Custody - most of it is already automated . Fund Administration - as long as you don't have NAV errors and you file statements on time, you're fine. You can add more controls but the expectation from the client is no NAV errors. Investor services - generally unprofitable as it is. It will all boil down to fees at the end of the day. If they can't raise their revenue, they have to cut costs or move as much as they can to cheaper service locations. Bundling services because other competitors can't? Fine, but expect to give a discount on that as well.

If they have to raise their fees, how do they justify it? What can you possibly add to custody services that will impress clients. More analytics? How realistic is that? What about Fund Accounting? How much more is there to do besides making the work cheaper by moving stuff to India and Poland?

The other side of the coin is that many in leadership have come from State Street, Northern Trust, BBH, and other competitors. Some BNYM alumni have gone to those places. Everyone knows each companies' strengths and weaknesses or at the very least, what clients are paying for services, like how much does it cost to settle a US trade STP? BNYM may win one client but a few months later, lose someone else. The main hurdle is that deconversion is costly to clients so they may have not feel the justification to push BNYM or any service provider too much on price.

This is why we are seeing layoffs in drips and drabs. That's all they can come up with and honestly it kind of checks out. At least if BNYM had a retail presence, they could dominate certain regions via branches or credit cards that offer perks with certain strategic partners. Nobody outside the industry even knows who BNYM are anyway.

Most of our leadership isn't here because they agree with BNYM's values or goals - they're just here to take a prestigious sounding role that would give them a higher pay check. They'll be gone in 2-3 years until the next regime comes in and reverses things the previous regime did, but then they'll leave before things get finished. There is really nothing to accomplish here or be proud. If you enjoy what they pay you and the work/life balance is pretty good, more power to you. But if you're doing all this work thinking it will have a major influence on BNYM's reputation in industry, that's an exercise in futility.

We're the dollar store of the Financial Services industry, but not just any dollar store - we're the one in the worst part of the city.

by
| 4641 views | | 8 replies (last ) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1qZmicFj

8 replies (most recent on top)

How can asset servicing be a commodity when so few banks provide this service?

A commodity can be had anywhere. Only a small handful of Custody Banks provide asset Servicing. Also, a service can be a commodity and vice versa.

University of Phoenix Grad?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @hfpb+1qZmicFj

Exactly! I worked in AS during that time and it was an absolute sh&t show. Entire teams taken over by cronies who had NO idea what was done on a typical day. Storing data in excel docs or a 20 year old access db is not innovative!!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @cfun+1qZmicFj

@4rq4

Absolutely too bloated with layers. In Asset Servicing & Digital, a senior leader was added and he brought in his own people to add another layer on top of the existing teams. There was no need for this. My team had a fairly specialized function that probably should've just stayed in Finance or sat in a strategy-based group that included other functions....and we got a very expensive senior leader who really was just my manager's manager - no other direct reports under her. What were they thinking?

I think they fixed a lot of layers in 2019, but that was more on the operations side. Asset Servicing (front office, product, sales, other functions, etc) had cuts as well, but 2021 start bloating themselves again. At least they finally cut some of the Global Client Management.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @4lgy+1qZmicFj

OP, I have a question.
Did you think there was too much administrative positions? There just seemed to be so many layers.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @4rqr+1qZmicFj

Been at BNYM over 15 years and you hit the nail on the head. Regime change that brings in their on cronies. New CIO comes along, brings in another set of cronies who have all these big ideas that don't make anything better. Rinse and repeat. I've not heard anyone in my department from manager director and below who have any clue what this new latest and greatest model will actually look like for our teams.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2kmc+1qZmicFj

Spent nearly 10 years in Asset Servicing and witnessed the downward spiral of the department. It went from a bustling department with no empty seats to the ill-fated working relationship with India to temporary workers and a cut-throat working environment.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1jmt+1qZmicFj

@OP, you have captured the entire BNYM business model in one simple comprehensive writing. Well done and agree whole heartily.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1xgp+1qZmicFj

OP here: didn't mean for this post to be so long but regardless of layoff rumors, if you're hungry for a more fulfilling career or just think you're underpaid, BNYM is NOT the place to be. You could hustle and innovate, but your stuff won't really make an impact to the bottom line.

Get what experience you can get here and use it to tidy up your resume.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @wzb+1qZmicFj

Post a reply

: