Thread regarding Wells Fargo & Co. layoffs

969 Million for severance

How many people do we think that is?
Also why aren't they smart enough to offer an early voluntary package that's less money but same benefits timeframe

by
| 3057 views | | 18 replies (last ) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1qxgjIye

18 replies (most recent on top)

Shart will never ever allow people to volunteer for severance. He enjoys tormenting employees way to much to miss out on that opportunity.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2wzf+1qxgjIye

Remember three years ago when they said they wouldn’t go the voluntary buy out because they would do it thoughtfully and with respect? At this point the amount of time it’s taking is ridiculous. Just let people volunteer for severance and start fresh. This way isn’t helping anyone

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1qfd+1qxgjIye

IIRC the $969M is on top of expected severance costs. There's also tons of plebes at WF that get the minimum in severance.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1htd+1qxgjIye

"25,000+, OP."
969 Mill doesn't cover 25000+.
The folks they would want to target first have more years and salary in.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1hjx+1qxgjIye

25,000+, OP.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1jpf+1qxgjIye

PICK ME! PICK ME! oh wait, my "boss" said we were "safe"

bwaaa haaa haaaaa

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1ybg+1qxgjIye

Voluntary severance will never happen, specifically because the execs WANT employees in fear for their financial future. It makes them more likely to find something else and leave voluntarily. Getting rid of everyone with the absolute minimum severance cost is ALL that Hudson Yards care about. They are perfectly willing to fail in every other way in order to achieve that.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1muh+1qxgjIye

@fzq
"It could be very orderly..."

You lost me at "orderly" 😆
This is WF, remember?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1fhe+1qxgjIye

Wells Fargo Reports Fourth Quarter 2023 Net Income of
$3.4 billion, or $0.86 per Diluted Share
Full Year 2023 Net Income of $19.1 billion, or $4.83 per Diluted Share

https://www08.wellsfargomedia.com/assets/pdf/about/investor-relations/earnings/fourth-quarter-2023-earnings.pdf

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1cgj+1qxgjIye

It's a great idea. They can determine the areas that need to be downsized and choose the number of employees from those departments. It could be very orderly and those that are constantly saying "pick me" could finally get their chance. Then those that really want to stay would have a better chance of surviving and not undergoing the mental abuse of wondering when the ax will fall. Wins all around.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @fzq+1qxgjIye

I’m going to do as little work as possible until the day comes when I am no longer here.
I am now actively working to undermine this company every chance I get.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @xyy+1qxgjIye

The real question is what kind of coward would deliberately hang layoffs over its employees heads and add stress to their lives.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ehm+1qxgjIye

"If anyone in the C suite wishes for improved morale, the layoffs need to be completed with finality very soon."

I don't think they care about morale. All they care is they hit that number in the spreadsheet so they can collect their bonus.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @cql+1qxgjIye

FY 23 total personal expense was about $35B. Assuming avg. severance pay is 4-5month, the annualized equivalent personal expense of $1B severance charge will be about $2.4-3.0B, which is about 7-8% of the total personal cost. Factoring in all the layoffs will almost happen in the US, the % of cut in the US will be larger, like 8-9%? Not an accountant. I am just doing an back-of-the-envelop calculation.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @bfd+1qxgjIye

And on a positive note...Daytona just unionized. Wells Fargo should remember how solidarity in Poland eventually led the country. More needs to be such as asking current leadership to resign. Then...sell the broker dealer to jp Morgan. Finally...change wells Fargo to a pure bank.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @pbs+1qxgjIye

Here's the thing... The words "smart" and "leadership" are not synonyms.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @lxi+1qxgjIye

Nah, not beaten to death. Still alive. These are still valid concerns/questions that most employees consider unacceptable/unresolved.

If anyone in the C suite wishes for improved morale, the layoffs need to be completed with finality very soon. Until then, way too many of us are going to half 🫏 it to stay sane. Why work hard just be laid off in a week? And plenty of exceeds and meets are laid off, so a response of 'work hard and you won't get laid off' is false.

That's where voluntary severance comes in. Wells can decide how it's administered, so there's nothing about it that would put the bank at risk of too many people leaving from the same group, etc.

People can volunteer for severance way faster than HR can figure out who to chop. Another benefit to voluntary severance is that the voluntary nature of it means fewer legal liabilities, lawsuits, etc.

We could also continue discussing 'location strategy' and how it limits talent to only a few areas of the country, but we'll save that for a future thread.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @fwz+1qxgjIye

Come on man, this has been beaten to death

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ryl+1qxgjIye

Post a reply

: