Thread regarding Cisco Systems Inc. layoffs

New CEO

Keep hearing Chuck is out, but no one knows who is replacing him!!

by
| 3110 views | | 23 replies (last ) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1r3ROQt6

23 replies (most recent on top)

What's the definition of stupidity?

Not grasping the actual point that top talent won't bother with Cisco no matter where it is sourced.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1gaf+1r3ROQt6

You wrote:
Needs to be a CEO from the outside, focused on tech innovation and aggressive growth.

"If I have these skills why would I go to Cisco where I need to waste all my efforts trying to transform the existing legacy so I don't lose my revenue and earning sources before I can tackle new problems when I can just do that at a startup where I can focus 100% of my energy on advancing the state of the art? Also, do you even know what aggressive growth means to a company with $58B in revenue and a market cap of over $200B? It's going to be far easier to make a $1M company into a $1B company than make a $200B company a $200T company...."

So then Cisco continues to promote from within....not a good footing if change is needed. What the ELT team is doing ISN'T WORKING. Why throw the same old stale horses at it then? What's the definition of stupidity?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1vxq+1r3ROQt6
Needs to be a CEO from the outside, focused on tech innovation and aggressive growth.

If I have these skills why would I go to Cisco where I need to waste all my efforts trying to transform the existing legacy so I don't lose my revenue and earning sources before I can tackle new problems when I can just do that at a startup where I can focus 100% of my energy on advancing the state of the art?

Also, do you even know what aggressive growth means to a company with $58B in revenue and a market cap of over $200B? It's going to be far easier to make a $1M company into a $1B company than make a $200B company a $200T company.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ure+1r3ROQt6

MM would be a disaster!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @niv+1r3ROQt6

@aly+1r3ROQt6 And he will be slicing and dicing Cisco for sale. He did amazing getting so overpayed for splunk so the board will want him to do the same here.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @rgv+1r3ROQt6

Ok knuckleheads, here’s what will happen.

After regulatory approval and close of the Splunk acquisition, Chuckie retires as CEO and takes over as chairman of the board. The Splunk CEO takes over the combined company and brings his “ELT”. Most (all?) of the current ELT gets canned or demoted.

I’m confident that this is the plan. If this doesn’t happen, then I’ll eat my shoe.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @aly+1r3ROQt6

where are the activist investors?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @pas+1r3ROQt6

MM is so bad in front of customers that sales finds all kinds of creative ways to keep her out of EBC’s. She used to come in with her sidekick (the chucklehead Indian guy in the too small suits) and the two of them were so uninformed and arrogant that we had to invent reasons to end their sessions early.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @sfi+1r3ROQt6

They want someone speaking English and knows culture. That's why Chucky went to Superbowl.

MM doesn't fit the bill.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @uuq+1r3ROQt6

Can you imagine MM on CNBC going over results?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @cla+1r3ROQt6

Needs to be a CEO from the outside, focused on tech innovation and aggressive growth. Needs to bring new energy and leadership. Clean out some of the remaining ELT, Stop spending unwisely. Enough of these stupid woke, gushy fan girly interviews. Liberal leadership doesn't work, time for adults to get back in.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @lfh+1r3ROQt6

MM is actively kept away from customers, so it won’t be her. Even the wokerati wouldn’t have her as CEO. She needs to retire and never be seen again. She has ki-led what is now known as ONEx with first the SFDC mafia and now the Google rejects.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @neq+1r3ROQt6

Not LC or MM. They both seem to think they are Tech genius, but both driving this respective orgs off cliffs, despite best efforts of their long time Cisco folks to limit the damage. Did you know, MM personally reviews every onex PRD/Epic, and is the only approver? Now you know why CX cloud is 4 years still not delivered and less than 200 active customers globally... more than LC's FSO Platform, but that's only 2 years late...

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @rft+1r3ROQt6

Splunk CEO wants house cleaned before he takes over

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @tbq+1r3ROQt6

it will be JP to match the trend at other tech companies. CEOs of MSFT/IBM/GOOG/etc all hail from _________.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @fjx+1r3ROQt6
Keep hearing Chuck is out,

... from voices in your head?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @sqc+1r3ROQt6

This company is already dexd and dxfxnxt

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @hab+1r3ROQt6

MM would be the last nail in the coffin.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @fwc+1r3ROQt6

Neither are good nor qualified.

Need a proven outsider that understands real growth and innovation.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @qzp+1r3ROQt6

JD better than v2momma

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @bcy+1r3ROQt6

rumors say it’s between JD and MM

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @sof+1r3ROQt6

I just heard same. Lots of speculation about his replacement. Many saying JP, others MM.

LOL. Now I know you're joking.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @lge+1r3ROQt6

I just heard same. Lots of speculation about his replacement. Many saying JP, others MM.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @rjj+1r3ROQt6

Post a reply

: