Thread regarding Wells Fargo & Co. layoffs

Peeps layed off in the last week-no severance

Apparently RTO requirements not met

by
| 2896 views | | 15 replies (last ) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1rnxwkBt

15 replies (most recent on top)

Fake news

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2hkk+1rnxwkBt

Moves of over 40 miles away will force severance, not firings.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2bev+1rnxwkBt

Sometimes it isn't as simple as "just return to the office". Myself and others on my team have been permanently remote since they sold our local WF offices. ROT for me means to pack up and move 5+ hours away... not so simple.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1ksg+1rnxwkBt

@1hla+1rnxwkBt

You are a disgusting human being. The office will be a little nicer when Shart downsizes you.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1kbp+1rnxwkBt

If true it’s about time!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1hla+1rnxwkBt

as pointed out, if you are let go because you failed to RTO then you are fired for cause, not laid off. if you don't want to get fired for not coming into the office then come into the office. pretty easy fix.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1pdo+1rnxwkBt

FA,

Find out.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @hji+1rnxwkBt

What did they think would happen?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @wmn+1rnxwkBt

Any wait to see how this affects the minoritylies on my team that think it doesn’t apply to them. We have a couple that are well below 3. Will they get the can?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @bsp+1rnxwkBt

FRTO. F it right in it's stupid Fing face.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @dsf+1rnxwkBt

So fired, not laid off.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @frw+1rnxwkBt

Not true. This would not be a layoff, this would be a termination due to not meeting mandated job requirements.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @xxz+1rnxwkBt

Not returning to the office is considered job abandonment.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @vci+1rnxwkBt

FRTO. However, assuming this is a factual account. That's not a layoff (in the legal sense), hence the no severance.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @pyq+1rnxwkBt

Sweeeeeeet

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @rsa+1rnxwkBt

Post a reply

: