Thread regarding Wells Fargo & Co. layoffs

Telecommute for me, not for thee

9/27/2019: "...Wells Fargo, still recovering from a fake-account scandal caused by sales managers running amok, will let its newly appointed CEO, Charles Scharf, run the San Francisco company from New York.

"Wells Fargo’s board had to know this telecommuting perk would raise eyebrows. To allow it speaks to how much trouble it probably had finding someone to take over what’s been called the toughest job in banking.

"Scharf 'had the leverage to negotiate' staying in New York, said Charles Elson, director of the Weinberg Center for Corporate Governance at the University of Delaware. 'They needed him and it was a tough job to fill.'

"But 'if you are going to change the culture of an institution, it’s important to be at the site of the culture,' Elson said. 'The headquarters is in San Francisco, and the top executives are in San Francisco, and the tone at the top comes from the top.'

"When Scharf, who takes over Oct. 21, was asked about running Wells from New York in a call with analysts Friday, he said, 'So listen, these jobs, whether it’s the Wells Fargo job or any other job I had, you spend very little time actually in your office. This is a broad national franchise.'

"On the call, Scharf said he is 'looking forward to be present in all of those places, including San Francisco, which is, obviously, a very important place for us.'"

https://www.sfchronicle.com/business/article/Wells-Fargo-s-new-CEO-will-run-the-SF-bank-from-14473535.php

by
| 1390 views | | 13 replies (last ) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1t1MO4Oy

13 replies (most recent on top)

Everyone knows why Wells started in SF...

We don't know why they STAY in SF.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1vdt+1t1MO4Oy

Everyone forgets why Wells is in San Fran. Go back to the beginning and figure it out. Amex is the reason.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1gch+1t1MO4Oy

operating committee approval to hire in NYC is so they can control their dating / s-xual harassment pool.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @fyj+1t1MO4Oy

I love how NYC is a core hub, yet it requires operating committee approval to hire in NYC.

They want to keep the peons out of HY, but then shouldn’t that be considered a “specialty market”?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @cye+1t1MO4Oy

I don’t see how you fix efficiency as either a ratio or a concept by increasing staff and fragmenting through NY presence. The cost is high and cultural disruptions even higher.

Cue the palace revolts. Some will be explicit, but more will be in the shadows.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @bhc+1t1MO4Oy

@rmh+1t1MO4Oy

So, next year?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @cjm+1t1MO4Oy

AI can do a better job than this hack.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @zgu+1t1MO4Oy

They're all a bunch of di-ks

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @bwr+1t1MO4Oy

The two reasons I can see having SF as headquarters:

  1. the stagecoach museum is there
  2. the AI and tech talent is there.

After they move the stagecoach museum to Charlotte and the AI tech from India there would be no need for SF.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @rmh+1t1MO4Oy

@ohx+1t1MO4Oy

Part of that is because of Scharf and who’s been hired for leadership roles since he came in. At the time he was hired at least, if not San Francisco, then Charlotte would’ve made much more sense for the CEO’s seat than NYC. At least among east coast cities.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @qis+1t1MO4Oy

Overall, San Francisco is dying.

Very little leadership is still there.

Why is SF still the headquarters?

Must be some advantage as CA is typically not business friendly in any way.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ohx+1t1MO4Oy

Poor Charlie, he has to work from home

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @iml+1t1MO4Oy

Old news. Get a life.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @flp+1t1MO4Oy

Post a reply

: