Thread regarding Cisco Systems Inc. layoffs

Executive leadership at the top is lost and does not care

Does anyone know what needs to be fixed to get the ship to turn 180 degrees? Impossible to move this massive disaster. Here is an interesting article that has been recently floating... https://www.futuriom.com/articles/news/heres-what-cisco-should-fix/2024/06

As for the 5 year chart on CSCO so far in a technology bull market, CSCO performance is -12.24% and you can compare it to its peers yourself.

If simplicity is the message everywhere, why does it not mean in Cisco's portfolio? So much diversification is ki-ling the company vs a handful of strong products in the core business of Networking and Security. Arista and Broadcom duo rocket is taking off and let's see where they are in 3 years from now compared to CSCO. I am not even talking about DELL, HPE, NVIDIA, AMD, etc. suppliers who will do very well selling into the large customers.

Enterprise Networking is declining and Arista is coming after it with a focused agenda. it also hired a few Cisco execs recently as well to build some Sales bench.

A $28B failure with Splunk will be easy to watch if it can really compete with the big heavyweights such as Palo, Crowdstrike, Datadog and Dynatrace. The cloud providers are also not sitting still as well with their integrated offerings.

There is no innovation and ELT should be responsible along with cleaning the SVP layer at the leadership level. Where are the metrics on their comp on performance, market share, etc. being weighted much higher than other metrics? These folks make decisions that impact 80K folks and the industry.

You will see YoY results soon on our core Networking business in a couple of months and judge for yourself if Cisco is turning around from result of acquisitions and layoffs

by
| 1937 views | | 11 replies (last ) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1t481wH3

11 replies (most recent on top)

If any of you had ba--s you would boo them at Vegas

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1ava+1t481wH3

Too late for Cisco. This is a corr-upt-ed company at all management levels. Too Late to even fire Chucky. Best option is to break it apart and sell or discontinue pieces.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1pne+1t481wH3

Think of it from standpoint of a business or startup with new apps and websites aimed at attracting new customers. AI pivotal in adding value/acquisition of customers/improvement of service in that space and why CEO/board of such a business wants to speak with AI leaders like MS/Chat GPT/Apple/NVidia etc. Cisco has little to offer other than PPT, FSO vaporware, a bunch of isolated products and pies-in-the-sky.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1qxg+1t481wH3

Chuck needs to get fired

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1jgs+1t481wH3

Had to attend a sales All Hands and the leadership wore sun glasses and funny hats and shirts. Lots of pats on the back and a spin on the number so they look good. Who is inspired by this hokey stuff? Oh wow look how cool our leadership is, I’m really going to go out and sell now! My advice, Be real, honest and focus people where they need to be focused. Cut the B.S. That’s a start.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @uvv+1t481wH3

Cisco simply can’t compete with truly engineering-lead companies. They acquire company, slowly ki-l it over a few years, and then move onto whatever company they want to acquire to pump the stock.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @lgz+1t481wH3

Cisco ELT is clueless. When Nvidia and others speak the world takes notice. No one listens to a word the clowns on the Cisco ELT say. Cisco is completely irrelevant in the boardroom and is a commodity.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @rjx+1t481wH3

The fact that Chuck and the ELT have decided that their best course of action is to present Cisco as a leader in AI with absolutely nothing to back it up tells you that they have nothing to offer the customer base.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @mxy+1t481wH3

Francine was in my regions earlier in the year I offered my strategic customers a '121 session with our executive, to align at all levels'

I was politely told we don't want people that have no value in meetings
They had apparently engaged before and not being impressed

Likes a LinkedIn post however

Leadership is frankly too removed from the front lines and not held accountable to the soldiers

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @gfu+1t481wH3

The stock is going to be at 40 by August. Nobody is safe.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @kia+1t481wH3

The leadership was hired to cut costs during a managed decline. They are exceeding expectations.

Cisco sells & markets legacy network equipment. Cisco is not a technology company.

Would you criticize Best Buy for a lack of innovation? No. Just because a corporation markets itself to investors as a technology company... doesn't mean it is

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @twd+1t481wH3

Post a reply

: