Thread regarding AT&T layoffs

T created a walking dead culture

I think that there are a lot of people who are waiting it out so that they will get severance. It's kind of like the walking dead. People want to leave, and won't be really upset if they get surplused, but they are just waiting around for the ax to fall. I can't say that I really blame them. T created this culture, so many people are just trying to take advantage of it.

From a personal perspective, I decided that I didn't want to be among the walking dead. There was no way that I was going to relocate. I was not asked to and did get assigned TW, and was supposed to go in 3 times a week. But even that was pretty hard, given the driving distance involved. I decided to leave and am very happy that I did. Hanging around waiting for severance is pretty demoralizing, and oddly stressful. Life is much better now.

Well said, @1add+1t7lWEE1. And if one can leave, one promptly should.

by
| 1077 views | | 6 replies (last ) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1t9wOY9s

6 replies (most recent on top)

severance - what a joke.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2awi+1t9wOY9s

"Leadership should make a decision to lower the cap on severance to 3 months."

Please! Let's make the workplace more toxic and unmotivating! That would be a true Stankey move.

Really, if you even think your going to get laid off, why put in the extra effort? Why not phone it in? It seems in their current surplus decisions, they aren't looking at an individual's contributions or experience. If you are in group they are cutting, you're gone. And they seem to be cutting all over the place, so why should anyone, anywhere, "go the extra mile"?

On top of the layoffs, the promised hiring and backfilling aren't happening, at least in my group. There are key roles for my group (project in IT) that they've just decided not to fill. I sure as he-l am not going to volunteer to fill in for any of them, because management has decided that they aren't important. Why should they be important to me? On top of that, if I did volunteer, then management would pat themselves on the back for "finding a solution" to the problem, and then they wouldn't think of it again. I'd be stuck. No way. Again, why would I want to go the extra mile for management that can't manage, but would take the credit for my work?

And before the trolls say "just leave", I'm close enough to my Ro75 that I've got incentive to stay and ride this out for a while. I'm one of only 2 developers on a project that is guaranteed not to go away any time soon, and I do enough to be the "go to" person. I don't fill in for the missing roles, but I do get myself noticed for good work (like doing double to work of the other developer, and helping troubleshoot issues that aren't my responsibility). I've got enough security to gamble a bit to stick around until my R075 date. Now after that date, the resumes go out and I get serious about an exit plan and do my best to make sure my management feels the pain of losing a knowledgeable employee.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @cmq+1t9wOY9s

Severance is going to 30 days in 2025. Most likely will be announced in February

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @pxf+1t9wOY9s

I don't like the suggestion to reduce the severance payouts but it would help with the employee turnover rate. The company can't win if we keep working like we're the government. If you know what I mean.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @lzz+1t9wOY9s

Now that's leadership...create a toxic culture and then penalize those who are asked to leave. Nice. Must be an SBC bell head shill.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @otm+1t9wOY9s

Leadership should make a decision to lower the cap on severance to 3 months. This would help solve this problem. There really are a lot of people phoning it in now.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @bqt+1t9wOY9s

Post a reply

: