Thread regarding AT&T layoffs

AT&T wants Big Tech firms to pay into telecom and broadband subsidy fund

Reuters: June 24, By David Shepardson

AT&T (T.N) CEO John Stankey said on Monday that Congress should give the Federal Communications Commission the power to require Big Tech firms to contribute to a government fund that subsidizes access to telecom and broadband services.

Under current law, fees are levied on cell phone and landline service subscribers to support the Universal Service Fund, which spends about $8 billion a year - nearly all collected from surcharges on telephone bills.

"The seven largest and most profitable companies in the world built their franchises on the internet and the infrastructure we provide," Stankey said in remarks at a telecom industry forum in Utah.

"Why shouldn’t they participate in ensuring affordable and equitable access to the services of today that are just as indispensable as the phone lines of yesteryear?”

The issue has taken on new urgency since a government broadband internet subsidy program used by 23 million households ran out of money in May and shut down after the White House unsuccessfully urged Congress to dedicate another $6 billion.

Since 2020, Congress had allocated a total of $17 billion to help lower-income families and people impacted by COVID get free or low-cost internet.

The Universal Service Fund provides funding to help low-income consumers, schools, libraries and rural health care providers to get access to telephone or broadband internet service.

There are several proposals in Congress to require tech companies and broadband providers to contribute to the fund.

by
| 1145 views | | 16 replies (last ) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1tcbgazm

16 replies (most recent on top)

In the highway fund example, the government funds it not a commercial interest.

It probably won’t work out but the idea makes sense as I’m sure these companies have made a fair amount of coin off the highway including from those getting subsidized access from the surcharge.

T no longer benefits from the pseudo government agency status where they could print money so they shouldn’t have the baggage that came with it.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1oib+1tcbgazm

I agree with the idea. The burden is unfairly weighed on AT&T.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @vyo+1tcbgazm

Wow, is this guy ever stupid! Now he's trying to alienate the seven big tech firms. They already avoid Stankey like the plague, but Stankey is making it impossible for these companies to continue to ignore him. I honestly don't know how much longer at&t can hang on, trying desperately to scratch out a meager profit. I don't see them lasting much longer than another year before filing Chapter 11.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @jha+1tcbgazm

"It’s like forcing them to contribute to a gofundme page so we can stay in business."

Turn those machines back on! We built this exchange...

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @spy+1tcbgazm

AT&T advocated for the FUSF and is getting millions from it so I say welcome to the world you asked for and stop complaining about those big bad tech companies...your jealousy is really showing! Hey, here's an idea - do the same and stop keeping the FCC in business.

Or maybe big tech needs to highlight to Congress the VERY negative effective corporate tax rate AT&T "pays".

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @coq+1tcbgazm

Stankey counting on everyone forgetting that AT&T has received far more in handouts from both the federal government & state governments than any of these tech firms.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @bnl+1tcbgazm

Just raise the prices on the d-mb pipes, AT&T controls a lot of the highway. I don’t think big tech is willing to become a carrier, Goggle tried, unsuccessfully. It’s very cost prohibitive and a mature market.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ewj+1tcbgazm

He wouldn’t need to beg, if he and Randall hadn’t made so many bad decisions.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ptq+1tcbgazm

It’s like forcing them to contribute to a gofundme page so we can stay in business.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @irr+1tcbgazm

He clearly realizes that this company was built via a government protected monopoly and it is not built to compete in an open economy. His only strategy has been to get back to corporate welfare. Sickening that he spews nonsensical progressive buzzwords while doing so.

The idea is insane. Shopping malls don't pay directly to the highway fund. Trucking companies do, and they either get paid enough for delivering goods to stay in business, or they don't stay in business.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @dyw+1tcbgazm

Reference to post I see the vote to keep COLR in California is having an impact

100%… FACT the exact day of the Feb outage was the day T was scheduled to take it to courts in CA. Big loss for T. It will be a long time T is stuck paying for copper in CA.
They shouldn’t have layed of so many people and the outage wouldn’t have happened.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @xie+1tcbgazm

I actually think this makes sense. What’s Google, Meta, etc… without a road to them?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ezj+1tcbgazm

Bob Ross imitator video, take 2!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @pyl+1tcbgazm

7 against 1, not good odds. More lobbyist and $$ to line political pockets.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @iqy+1tcbgazm

Maybe Stink needs to call his pals in the WH and get whoever is running the country to simply issue an executive order making it so because following the current law is so yesterday. Hey Stink, you and RJS have been out lobbied on this issue for decades - that's why you're the d-mb pipe!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @nmh+1tcbgazm

I see the vote to keep COLR in California is having an impact.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @kyi+1tcbgazm

Post a reply

: