Thread regarding Wells Fargo & Co. layoffs

When will location strategy fail?

It is abundantly clear that location strategy is nothing more than a poorly disguised plan to fire employees for arbitrary reasons. You want to consolidate real estate? Ok, that’s fair enough, but there are better ways to go about doing that.

In my LOB I continue to see a significant number of mid level managers and executive director level contributors that are still either remote or in non-hub locations. A lot of institutional knowledge will be lost if they were all let go at once, and this would certainly be detrimental to the business and create operational risk. Management knows this and seems to trying to tread carefully on the topic of location strategy, for now at least.

Meanwhile there are rumblings here about other locations moving in and out of “hub status” for various LOBs. Some LOBs haven’t even clarified what their specialty locations are, which I suspect is because it is still subject to change and they are still figuring it out. It feels like such a sh!t show and is really impractical all around given the vastly spread-out nature of this company. I am hoping that management will be forced to rethink this asinine strategy at some point before too much damage is done.

by
| 1345 views | | 11 replies (last ) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1uEIzTXx

11 replies (most recent on top)

Chase just announced a data breach… will WF follow Jamie’s f-up ?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1ixa+1uEIzTXx

It is abundantly clear that you are far down the food chain and are not privy to organizational reasoning for choices. You stay on this outrage bandwagon you dolt!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1aix+1uEIzTXx

@jtx+1uEIzTXx It's a long running management by reaction. They're not really thinking of long term effects of the purge. We are big and complex. Information, how things work and why is very much in people's heads. This leadership team has been mistake after mistake and then people have to deal with the consequences- MRAs, audit issues, internal compliance issues, outages (TK had to appoint her bud to deal with stability issues-- that should tell you something)

It's like any other company that has been trashed b/c of bean counters vs. people who actually are thinking about what's needed. Look at Boeing.

Beyond that, it is also addressing bad decisions over the years-- remember when we went thru the whole span of control thing? For years people building their fiefdoms would hire managers who would have no direct reports or maybe one. Then the idea was to reduce managers and target a certain number of DRs. That made sense.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @omd+1uEIzTXx

If they wants us in the office 5 days a week next year, they better keep as many hubs as possible.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @nrn+1uEIzTXx

Some hubs are going and new hubs (such as Columbus Ohio) are forming. Why does management want to increase churn (rate at which employees leave or are terminated from a company). In the past Wells Fargo was known as a place that gave out good salaries, bonuses -- all to reduce churn. Reducing churn can lead to decrease costs, increased productivity (efficiency), and restore the company's reputation.

  Why do they want to increase churn now? Did they give up on releasing the asset cap? So they don't care if it continues. Is well facing financial difficulties we don't know about and want to downsize? Did they (or the new JPMrs) deem the old WF employees as low performers and want to replace us? Is the offshoring proving effective so they want it to increase? I ask all what is causing this reactionary strategy?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @uxt+1uEIzTXx

@qpo+1uEIzTXx

CS wants to look like he’s doing something something to keep getting his fat bonuses.

Location strategy could be fixed by just grandfathering in people at their current locations in their current roles and limiting job change and new openings to hub/specialty markets.

It is all smoke and mirrors.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @zni+1uEIzTXx

@jtx+1uEIzTXx This is what I don’t understand… there’s an intense focus on cutting costs everywhere throughout the company, yet paying severance costs and then rehiring and training can in many cases become a lot more expensive than just keeping the people who are capable of doing the work already

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @qpo+1uEIzTXx

When location strategy for tech was announced in February, there were meetings over it.

It was stated that hub/specialty markets on the list were current as of February. That those lists could change as they will continue to re-evaluate.

Location strategy serves two purposes. It is an easy excuse for layoffs without regards to discrimination for age, race, disability. It is a further negotiating tool with local governments on taxation.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @suy+1uEIzTXx

Call centers to go to Manila and rest whatever can go to India should go and all rest roles remains and all locations outside of hubs made remote and all real estate sold off to fund stock repurchased over 10 years …efficiency ratio at 64% will easily come down to 40%…rest is all interim noise

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @wkt+1uEIzTXx

It'll fail when we have major issues and things don't get done. They'll just start having to hire people again. There are several areas I've already seen where there are nowhere near enough people to comply with various policies.

It's one thing to close down centers because of real estate costs. It's quite another to get rid of people working remote.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @jtx+1uEIzTXx

Regardless of how badly the outcome will be...RTO will not fail and has not failed...that is how it will be spun no matter the results...

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @qxp+1uEIzTXx

Post a reply

: