Thread regarding AT&T layoffs

What’s the RTO attrition rate that would please leadership?

All of us? We will not get better working conditions. Just less personal time and more expenses. When being herded like a cattle into barn-like conditions doesn’t work out and we don’t meet the desired attrition rate, what will be next? I’m morbidly curious about what they will come up with to make us go away.

by
| 1381 views | | 15 replies (last ) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1vFUIIIn

15 replies (most recent on top)

anything less than the competition, T is all about copying other companies and what Blackrocks orders, zero innovation or leadership

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1bnv+1vFUIIIn

About 90%. Keep a small handful to project manage the contractors and process their paperwork.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1fkm+1vFUIIIn

30k more out the door

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1gbz+1vFUIIIn

110%. F anybody who wants to get hired in the future.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1qrr+1vFUIIIn

JTS wants to get to sub 50k employees. Do the math.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1xcd+1vFUIIIn

How do we compare to VZ when they are about to absorb the Frontier employees, adding thousands of new employees. What that tells me is having a larger fiber footprint requires more
employees. Am I wrong?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @xma+1vFUIIIn

“ More or less, Stank wants us to align to Verizon and Tmo. Hyper focused on revenue to headcount numbers.”

VZW seems more realistic considering our fiber footprint.

If he loses 25% from 5 day RTO he should easily get to a headcount on par with VZW when it’s lumped with normal layoffs and attrition.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @uke+1vFUIIIn

Drastic cuts are planned as employees start to be held accountable for working 40-hour weeks.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @jzw+1vFUIIIn

More or less, Stank wants us to align to Verizon and Tmo. Hyper focused on revenue to headcount numbers.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @cza+1vFUIIIn

Has anyone discussed the possibility of Stinkey and the Board cutting down to a skeleton crew, so that T can be acquired by another player? Maybe an overseas telco?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @sse+1vFUIIIn

I’m glad that we all understand now what is really happening here. It never was about culture, collaboration, etc., and it was always about reducing employee count. As painful as this seems, I like knowing the truth. There is power in truth.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @sel+1vFUIIIn

“ Couple that with Trump about to crack down on offshoring”

Oddly enough I overheard AVP’s talking to a VP about this and there is a lot of talk about that in the c suite it seems. 2025 is going to be extremely interesting at this company.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @iow+1vFUIIIn

Lots of studies, but 5x RTO rules along with the 8 hr mandatory mandate with no flexibility (yeah senior VPs said flex, but your direct reports AVPs and Directors are saying otherwise) will likey result in ~ 25% +/- attrition rate. Majority of that will be the younger hires and the other most skilled talent that can find something else. So, not the people you want to be losing. Net net, this will be another Stinky mess as things start coming off the rails. But to the OPs point, they don’t care, they think you don’t add any real value, and that they can easily replace you. All the job postings in career hub in Dallas says otherwise as they struggle to find talent. This will just make it way worse. Couple that with Trump about to crack down on offshoring and in-shoring and they are going to have some serious problems.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ypg+1vFUIIIn

30-40%

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @eew+1vFUIIIn

95%

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @kdi+1vFUIIIn

Post a reply

: