I can't speak for other sectors but, in my part of this enterprise, every new application that is pushed upon us to do our jobs is worse than the previous one we had been using. Shouldn't the new versions of introduced programmes be easier to use than their predecessor or, is user-friendliness now out of fashion here?
7 replies (most recent on top)
Because they talked all of the Americans and their school systems into training for IT during the 1980s which led to the Internet adoption, AOL, Google, Facebook and Wireless 4G. Then, when all of these Americans started making money, they were laid off and replaced with South Asians and Asians who do not share similar ethics. The same can be said for customer service. Globalists, and globalism and greed of the left 'ended' the goose laying all of the golden eggs.
In the news today is that one of our former employees was just sentenced to 4 years in prison for cyber spying for the Chinese government.
Fortunately 'elections have consequences' and the company was more than consequential with a lot of unAmerican things over the past 5 years. Change will be at hand, even at the black tower.
IT
Id--t
Technology?
Ignore
Testing?
Indians
Tiddling?
Imploding
Tu-d?
This is what happens when you outsource your IT to the lowest bidder.
It would be nice to still be trained in the use of a new app when it comes out, like the old days, instead of struggling through it by yourself.
in our department we had platforms that work and people that are already proficient at using them, then every six months middle management comes along and breaks an already working system by imposing bug infested, broken, user-unfriendly, ki-k ridden "new" platforms that require multiple work arounds and endless re-training to get anything done. The ultimate solution to ( the opposite of ) productivity with maximum amount of headache and frustration. Bravo, mission accomplished.
The board of directors own companies that are developing our software. It doesn’t matter if it works, they got paid. You’ll all be outsourced by 2028 anyway
We don't standardize processes and when we attempt to we b@st@rdize the process. What you're seeing is MVP's scraped together through three different sets of contractors who failed to do KT. As the pieces come together they don't fit congruently and this is visible in about every project we produce right now.
We produce project after project that's supposed to simplify our lives, but the priorities are confused from leaders, and value add is cooked.