Thread regarding Wells Fargo & Co. layoffs

Investors loved all the cost-cutting at Boeing…until planes started crashing.

Shareholders are cheering the deceptive “Wells Fargo comeback story” as Charlie cuts costs, cuts corners, cheapens products and services, slashes headcount, sells off profitable business lines, offloads sensitive work to outside vendors and third-world countries, closes hundreds of branches, pulls out of cities, degrades the quality of our investment advice and research, eliminates experienced knowledgeable staff and disturbingly backs out of simple classic banking activities such as mortgages.

Will investors still love the stock when they see the end results of his inherently flawed business strategy? When shareholders realize the aggressive cost-cutting has jeopardized the quality and safety of our services, reduced customer satisfaction, and that most other banks are growing their services rather than decimating them - is WFC still going to be a Buy? They think they’re investing in a Lexus, but it’s an exploding Pinto in disguise.

Wells Fargo cannot save its way to prosperity. The bank is following a short-term path with poor long-term results. I’ve always appreciated the old adage: “You can make a pizza so cheap, nobody will want to eat it.”

by
| 891 views | | 8 replies (last ) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1vzL00Nh

8 replies (most recent on top)

This company is saving money? Evidence of this? Last time I looked we blew every penny of profit, and then some, on stock but backs. Or are we pretending that that's not an expense?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @6dtt+1vzL00Nh

More likely is that Boeing started to reap the benefits of DEI

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1wmi+1vzL00Nh

@axf+1vzL00Nh We know the entire world is going AI. However, imagine 90% of the world unemployed...

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1ryt+1vzL00Nh

@vnp

You missed the point.

Our proverbial plane is crashing and investors absolutely care about their money.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1aus+1vzL00Nh

Oh relax. It’s just people’s money not their lives.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @vnp+1vzL00Nh

It would be nice if the board recognized his failure to get us out of this regulatory mess so we could grow again, rather than have to gut the company.

Apparently Chicago needs branches, and lots of them.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @qks+1vzL00Nh

Come on. Everyone is going to digital banking. For you old folks that's where people bank using their phones. They expect robo-advisors for you WIM guys. Robo-advisors are far less threatening to us than you slick wall street guys. So in the new age of banking who needs branches?
Could you take a look at India? Most of the banking there is done digitally. In India, getting a rickshaw to take you to the branch is painful. That's why they are way ahead of us using phones. That is why Charlie is outsourcing to India.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @axf+1vzL00Nh

Cool story

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @rzf+1vzL00Nh

Post a reply

: