Thread regarding AT&T layoffs

Discrimination suit against employees that are far from offices, women, disabled

Basically like Amazon.

by
| 1299 views | | 11 replies (last ) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1w3RP3Ak

11 replies (most recent on top)

This is so ridiculous.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @bgl+1w3RP3Ak

So if you're one of 400 employees working in Chile and stinky (Stankey) tells you to relocate to New Mexico or lose your job, is that discrimination against employees in Chile?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @zdh+1w3RP3Ak

No wonder T is in the toilet. Employees with this low of an IQ…

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @rql+1w3RP3Ak

"National origin protected status" means that a person's country of origin, ancestry, or ethnicity is considered a protected characteristic under the law, meaning it is illegal to discriminate against someone based on where they or their ancestors are from; essentially, it protects individuals from being treated differently due to their national origin.

Protected classes in the State of California include:
race,
religion,
color,
national origin,
ancestry,
physical disability,
mental disability,
medical condition,
genetic information,
marital status,
s-x,
gender,
gender identity,
gender expression,
age (age discrimination is discriminating against someone 40 or older),
s-xual orientation, and
military and veteran status.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @dcr+1w3RP3Ak

Living far from the office is a legal protected class? I don't think so.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @xlj+1w3RP3Ak

Or maybe AT&T and Amazon do plan to file a discrimination suit against their employees after RTO? Rub salt in a wound.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @jcs+1w3RP3Ak

Discrimination filed against AT&T and Amazon by their employees (including those who are far from offices, women, and disabled). AT&T employees flee to Verizon. Amazon employees flee to Microsoft.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ipa+1w3RP3Ak

Oh you poor victim!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @uqk+1w3RP3Ak

You need to do a little research on at will employment.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @aro+1w3RP3Ak

T is suing employees? What? 😂

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @whv+1w3RP3Ak

Try restructuring your sentence so it’s coherent. Someone is suing employees because they are a woman? Imbecile.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @knn+1w3RP3Ak

Post a reply

: