Thread regarding Follett layoffs

Course Materials....

The course materials department being fixed and making money is about as real as the seven dollar bill.

They are worse off than ever.... and look at the management team have... one went to school studying agricultural engineering, the other speaks when an accent worse than G*nd, the other is just high class trash and the best one of them has no idea how any of the databases work to support textbooks/course materials and has to depend on her lead who apparently gets by eating snacks all day and d issappearing for more than half of their work day.

If that's how they plan on fixing wholesale... more power to them.

by
| 537 views | | 3 replies (last ) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+AQBdzvM

3 replies (most recent on top)

also receive should have said E, and it should be 'Capital' not caital. This is what I get for poor proofreading.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @3dOf+AQBdzvM

With regards to the changing nature of the CM world, I'm noticing a major drop in titles available wholesale. If I were a betting person, I'd say we can expect a switch from our current methodology of Wantlisting to be superceded entirely by the home office based on QTCs which they are also working to centralize. The end result will be we simply ship books from one store to another relying on a shrinking overall inventory with stores acting as waypoints between titles. This idea of stores being 'mini-warehouses' has been discussed before, but the method of execution is interesting given how much Follett leadership has spent on logistical updating (Kiva robots, the warehouse at Aurora, the throughput expansion at the warehouse, etc.) I suspect that in five years time (assuming the business exists in a similar manner then) stores will simply be responsible for collecting adoptions (Connect-Once doesn't seem to have taken off enough to think it's inevitable on all campuses) and reciving or shipping merchandise. The problem in this idea however lies in the fact that every attempt at automation thus far has been a resounding failure costing the company a great deal in capital. It's almost like flogging a dead horse enough that one hopes to convince others its still alive by the twitching the corpse does when struck. I also think we have a case of 'new' leadership deciding to damn the expense of previously developed initiatives (again, the warehouse) as not worth salvaging and sacrificing even more caital on redundant processes because they somehow believe -their- idea is superior. That's not success, that's hubris of the worst sort.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @3ELf+AQBdzvM

If the message from the President of the F-team is any indication, all we need to do is embrace change and allow things to be centralized as that means those wicked mean old bookstores no longer have to practice their evil wicked ways of analyzing their own markets and sourcing appropriately.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2MML+AQBdzvM

Post a reply

: