http://wccftech.com/mongoose-soc-from-samsung-shows-dominating-benchmark-results/
looks like better than 820 in terms of score
11 replies (most recent on top)
Which chips perform best with Samsung bloatware? Do these have bloatware accelerators or various bloatware coprocessors? Some sort of BPU?
why will 820 be better? will it be in Canon 5D Mark IV?
I don't know if people are reading that site but it looks 100% fake. 820 will be much better than mongoose BUT it doesn't matter, consumers don't buy for cpu anymore and mongoose will be cheaper
is Samsung going with in-house or with Q?
Samsung has been caught in previous tests for turning off certain features and maximizing full out performance for these stupid tests. Put into a real product with their bloatware and you will see how good it really is or should i say isnt?
EXYNOS processors have already been used in Chinese oem low cost phones.
Samsung revenue was boosted by the chip foundry revenue, mostly due to making EXYNOS processor. Do you think Samsung is going to give up $1billion?
Samsung is take cue from Apple. The CPU needs to be capable but does not need to be the best. It is more important to be able to control all features. Apple does just fine with its inferior CPU.
It doesn't even mention what benchmark is being used, complete BS
http://www.technobuffalo.com/2015/06/29/snapdragon-820-benchmark-annihilates-competition/
Is this bad news for 820? Can someone please post insightful analysis?