Thread regarding Qualcomm Inc. layoffs

Apart from layoff, buyback and financial engineering: is there really any future for Qualcomm? (serious comments please)

Qualcomm is facing headwinds this year: royalty share is decreasing, technology prominence in 4G and 5G is soft, customers are building their own application processors and the share price looks quite overvalued compared to certain competitors.

Qualcomm is facing major problems concerning various aspects which will affect its business.

1)Royalties:

First of all, the royalty business is a problem not to be underestimated. Qualcomm's customers like Apple Inc. (NASDAQ:AAPL) are pushing to cut royalties fees related to "old" technologies and it looks like this trend is not over at all. Qualcomm has a rich portfolio in the 3G sector but that is not the same for the 4G and 5G sectors. Indeed, its average royalty rate has been decreasing steadily for seven years. Given that the average smartphone price is currently decreasing, royalties are affected because they are generally priced in relation to retail smartphone prices.

China also is the source of several issues: 1) Chinese OEMs are underreporting orders, 2) Wang Xiang has been hired by Xiaomi, and 3) Chinese companies are increasingly adopting anti-competitive behaviors.

  1. Exposure toward Samsung and Apple:

Qualcomm has a high exposure to Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. (OTC:SSNLF) and Apple: the revenues derived from these two companies increased from 38% of 2012 to 49% of 2014, besides which, this supplying share is still rising.

It's obvious that such a heavy reliance is not healthy to Qualcomm because an eventual Samsung and Apple detachment from Qualcomm's products would deeply hit revenues and market share. While other companies implemented and heavily criticized the Snapdragon 810, Samsung has directly skipped this SoC due to overheating problems. Tim McDonough (Qualcomm's VP of Marketing) tried to pour oil on troubled waters, stating that customers have simply overestimated the SD810 overheating issues.

I think that Qualcomm's defense is simply impossible on this matter due to three main reasons:

1.Every SD810 smartphone faced lower battery life compared to the previous models and competitors' phones. Moreover, certain companies had to lower the TDP to achieve better thermal dissipation.

2.Anandtech has shown that the average power consumption of LG Flex 2 SD810 is higher than previous SD805 typical systems and the same goes for power efficiency. It means indeed that SD810 is a very hot and energy consuming SoC, even if other system components must be considered.

3.Every smartphone faces some kind of thermal throttling, but SD810 throttles quite more than competitors. You can see its behavior here.

It is also known that Samsung will probably use both the next SD820 and Exynos (news 1 - news 2) in its high-end offer, but anyhow, it's already clear that Samsung is planning to lower dependence on Qualcomm in the coming years. Obviously, it's not possible to exclude that customers tried to exploit the heat issue to reduce the SoC's price since nearly every customer company loudly complained about it.

Speaking about Apple, the company is succeeding in cutting down Qualcomm's royalties and it will likely reduce its dependence on Qualcomm's baseband chips. It may happen because Apple has the tendency to not massively lean on one single company but it prefers to diversify its supplies. Apple has already been switching from Samsung to Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Ltd. (NYSE:TSM), and vice versa, in application processors, but last reports claimed that Apple is stocking up A9 SoCs from both Samsung and TSMC, pushing them to lower prices.

It must not be forgotten that Intel, Samsung and TSMC will have similar node technologies for 10nm production, but Intel will use a 7nm beol for the 7nm node, instead of TSMC which will still use a 10nm beol.

In such a scenario, Intel has the right trump cards to really enter the market and partially steal Qualcomm market share in coming years.

http://seekingalpha.com/article/3514666-qualcomm-will-see-its-soc-market-share-erode-in-the-next-few-years

by
| 715 views | | 12 replies (last ) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+DySTxmu

12 replies (most recent on top)

Excellent post thank you . You touch on many reasons qualcomm core business will never achieve their former glory. They will die a slow and painful death. Regarding the non core businesses which sadly are all spearheaded by PJ a spoiled kid from la jolla who should have stayed in the skate board park instead of destroying his dads company. Everything he touches turns to sh@t/ Drones, healthcare, ect. You dont think there are smart companes in the valley like Google working on these who actually know how execute.. cmon qualcomm your glory days are long gone. I look forward to the day when a google drone will deliver my android smartphone directly from a manufacturer in vietnam for less than cost of coconut. see how many senior vp salaries that biz plan will support.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @Yqz+DySTxmu

It's going to be a race to the bottom.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ikM+DySTxmu

Very good post. I'm seeing Q as a maturing company. They've proven they can't buy or develop technologies to drive the core business (Media Flo, Globalstar, Digital Cinema, Mirasol, etc) (btw: how many of these was PJ involved in?). They stick with CDMA modems they're in good shape, deviate and they lose. IMHO, they're on a course to grow with the market, and shrink as that market becomes commoditized.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @YwN+DySTxmu

Education is a growth market. Maybe they can market PM / Dir. / VP training academy!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @g5n+DySTxmu

The future's so bright, we have to wear headlamps... WIthout the next "big thing" Qualcomm is destined to become a small company. Maybe a miracle will occur, but don't count on it.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2ba+DySTxmu

Lol!

Can anyone imagine a disruptive technology coming out of murthy, sm , and cristiano?

Not even in your most wildest dream!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1xj+DySTxmu

You can thank hee Jun p, m Spartz and his boy r nambiar (not rohit) for the power disaster. Long live the cronies.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @J7t+DySTxmu

Excellent post. Very well reasoned. Short answer no future unless they come up with the next new innovative thing. When Qualcomm started CDMA was able to penetrate market because it was disruptive technology that was at least ten times better than TDMA. The Q took military spread spectrum technology and brought to market and made huge success.

They need to come up with new disruptive technology. That is not easy and hard to catch lightning twice. Also QTL cash cow that printed money and funded large expenditures in R and D. In Intellectual Property circles Qualcomm was a MEGA troll with a hugely successful chip business. Licensing business losing steam and companies like Apple, Samsung, LG and so on don't want to pay exorbitant tax (the royalty) on total handset price and also want alternate chips so they are not be holding to a virtual monopoly company. Also they screwed Samsung when the gave the Chinese lower royalty rates than the Korean telcos that launched and made the Q a success

Remember job security never comes from organization unless maybe federal government. It comes from your current skill set and your flexibility in teaching yourself the skills of the future. Never stop learning and never give up and don't feel sorry for yourself

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @k3v+DySTxmu

Bwahahaha

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @X5s+DySTxmu

Qualbomb lol

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @9Ri+DySTxmu

I don't think so (in the long term). Even if it successfully enters into fancy applications like IoT and drones, they won't generate that much of profit as they aren't essential for wide range of customers

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @IYm+DySTxmu

Q have missed the opportunities under PJ and SM.

Now the down trend cannot be stopped.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @cxv+DySTxmu

Post a reply

: