http://blogs.reuters.com/breakingviews/2015/12/23/global-smartphone-brands-face-mass-extinction/
Unfortunately, Qualcomm's #1 customer is these small cellphone makers. Coincidence? I think not.
http://blogs.reuters.com/breakingviews/2015/12/23/global-smartphone-brands-face-mass-extinction/
Unfortunately, Qualcomm's #1 customer is these small cellphone makers. Coincidence? I think not.
I would have sex with her though: https://mobile.twitter.com/mak_robyn
Who cares about her degree. HTC has no reason to exist as a smartphone maker. They should fold.
Experts like her are dime a dozen, ok, she has a soft degree from a decent school, but no industry experience at all
Robyn Mak joined Reuters Breakingviews in 2013 - she has 2 years of working experience and knows about our industry as much as my Labrador.<<<
you are the labrador.
"She holds a masters degree in international economics and international relations from the #1 graduate school foreign policy and is a magna cum laude graduate of New York University."
Poppycock hearsay and rumors. Get back to work. The holiday is over.
Half those don't have Q chips
3 words: Digital Equipment Corporation
"The author is a Reuters Breakingviews columnist. The opinions expressed are her own."
Robyn Mak joined Reuters Breakingviews in 2013 - she has 2 years of working experience and knows about our industry as much as my Labrador.
Mr fact, that fact is in the article. So what's your point?
Well Mr. Skeptic there exists a thing called "FACT" which are a tool used by extremely smart people to support their conclusions. So the next time you decide to bring a knife to a gun battle, you might want to bring along something else called "FACTS". http://www.idc.com/getdoc.jsp?containerId=prUS25988815 . That's 6.8% YoY growth, also known as a "FACT".
Sounds like more anti Qualcomm FUD via intel's vast network of dishonest bloggers. It's all quite clear if you read siliconinvestor