Interestingly, this is the easy formula used by management. What about ideas like reduction in salaries?, or furlow?, or integration to eliminate duplications?, or closing business units that have never been profitable?, or a combination of all of this?. Of course, at the end of the day there will be lay-offs, but these are different that just massive lay-offs as the current practice is. Additionally, what about cutting at the top for lack of performance?. Wouldn't this be a noble idea?
In the case of Weatherford, it has been years since the company was profitable, and amazingly, my understanding is that the top executives have not missed a bonus, and have been exempted from the accountability of the results. However, today, the same executives have the best excuse for further negatively affecting the livelihood of employees (families) without discrimination. What is the excuse?, market conditions. This is not only through massive lay-offs, but also through eliminating bonuses to employees in 2015 for what was done in 2014, with the promise of granting it in split percentages of company shares (not cash), starting on April 2016. Those employees still working at Weatherford know what I am talking about. Those not working for the company anymore, won't get anything if laid off before April 2016. I wonder, will said shares be available still?
Moreover, if you had any stock options that were not vested at the time of lay-offs, you can start kissing them good bye. The company takes them back.
Times are tough, and tough decisions need to be taken. Everyone understands it. However, aren't real leaders, lead by example?