Thread regarding Qualcomm Inc. layoffs

What ails QIPL & BDC ?

  • Incompetent insensitive HR which covers its ass and does nothing for Employee-welfare ?

  • Corruption ?

  • Working in fear ?

  • Rigid policies for engineers ?

  • Internal politics ?

  • Leaders with no vision ?

  • Lack of accountability ?

  • Losers and misfits from US shoved down as bosses ?

  • Overpaid Management that does not care for their Teams ?

  • Connections with SD more important than technical ability ?

Extravagant stocks that make up for all the ills ?

by
| 2212 views | | 10 replies (last ) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+G58ft9N

10 replies (most recent on top)

Yep

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @dVpio+G58ft9N

Old post but sadly still true now also

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @cgwrb+G58ft9N

Great job everyone in QIPL and BDC you are doing a great job.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1iok+G58ft9N

Oh chandu is HR , right ? I know him from so.many years..he is such a h, pervert ..any where he sees girls start poking his small d*k.

How can you expect any good thing from him.....

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1wgt+G58ft9N

I work in QIPL... It's a slave factory and your owners are all the Sr. Directors and above...

If you are a Yes man.. Way to go... Every one of the Sr. Dir has some or the other side business...

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1fpy+G58ft9N

All of above and some.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1mth+G58ft9N

Rebel! Rebel!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @pdo+G58ft9N

The vision for QIPL was to do the dirty work, that SD engg folks do not like to do.. So to that extent it seems to be performing its task reasonably. I don't really think management is really committed to improving it, or giving it some real meaty projects to do on its own.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @krr+G58ft9N

My guess: All of the above--which does not appear to be a choice.

(1) At most companies, HR provides CYA for certain actions taken by management. Many of the benefits duties and other ministerial functions they used to provide are not contracted out to third party providers. The only time they see most employees face to face is to make sure employees fill out the paperwork correctly (--i.e., in the employer's favor--) upon hiring, and during the exit interview.

(2) Corruption and working in fear strike me as flip sides of the same coin where ever you have an imbalance of power between management and skilled employees. Rigid policies for engineers are a symptom that perpetuates this environment.

(3) Internal politics that enable people who lack vision and merit to advance at the expense of more qualified engineers is also a factor. In this politicised environment, lack of accountability thrives. This, of course perpetuates and increases the number of managers and leads who are overpaid considering their lack of knowledge, and who have no interest in the welfare of their team. Their primary goal is making themselves look good at all costs. Management in the sector of Qualcomm's costs outlay that is least productive and is where Qualcomm is losing most of its money. Ironically, it has been virtually immune to cuts during the recent spate of layoffs. Qualcomm may like to argue that cream rises to the top, but shit

also tends to float when it contains enough fat.

(4) Not sure what you mean by losers and misfits from US shoved down as bosses. Qualcomm's main product for many years was essentially intellectual property. Qualcomm promoted (primarily) Indians up the ranks because they wanted management flunkies who would rat out their "brothers" if they started ripping off IP while they were transitioning from H-1B status to possible green card status. They needed people who spoke the lanuage(s) in addition to something akin to English. Also, they were paid less than the white engineers who were promoted to manager. And also, this trend began about the time the federal government started getting on Silicon Valley's ass for not having diverse workforces. (Never mind the fact that fewer than 10% of all engineers were women, and less than 2% of all engineers were black or hispanic.) That's a win-win in any corporation's playbook. I can't fault them for that.

(5) Connections with San Diego are more important than technical ability because Irwin has this not-so-secret fantasy of being a political mover and shaker. Of course that will never happen in this town because he's Jewish. (Of course they will take his money and name stuff after him.) Nathan Fletcher was Irwin's Protestant "beard." That's why Fletcher makes the big bucks, and manages to teach at a UC Campus with a degree from Bible College. (C'mon, you knew it wasn't brains.)

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @nnf+G58ft9N

The following older post by M. Gandhi answers your question:

"You have brought this upon yourselves.

Some immigrated to this county because they saw greatness in democracy, freedom of expression, and the rule of reason and law. They came here to be a part and to contribute to it. They took it upon themselves to do whatever it takes to preserve the values that made this country free and prosperous.

The rotten abyss that is called Qualcomm is of your own making. Some of you have imported the culture of nepotism, fear, pacifism, and the worst of all, capitulation to abuse from your home countries. Working for Qualcomm in U.S is no better than working (and living) in a third world country now. You have been complicit with this because this is what you have known all your lives. Capitulating to dictatorship and abuse keeps you in your comfort zones.

Does it sound familiar that you are made to work 12 hours per day, weekends, company holidays, and then disposed of as soon as you are not needed? Does it sound familiar to you that your "great leaders" gave themselves $95 million worth of stock grants in January while this is happening? Does it sound familiar to you that if you criticize them about anything or if you have an innovative technical idea that is different than that of the boss, they will get rid of you through a bogus PIP with unconditional help from their HR? Does it sound familiar to you that engineers get mentally exhausted to the point that they jump from Qualcomm buildings (2010 and 2012) and HR tries to cover it up? All of this would sound normal to a factory worker in Foxconn City industrial park in Shenzhen, China.

By the way, are you hoping for ground-breaking and innovative products to come out of this place?

What could you do now?

Qualcomm has been thriving on importing and abusing low-cost H1-B workers as replacement for their older age workers. If they "layoff" employees, they wouldn't legally be able to get new H1-B workers in the future because they wouldn't be able to make the case to the immigration authorities that they were short of US workers. Moreover, if they "layoff", they would have to pay a severance package to the employee which would cost them. They would also run the risk of the employee bringing a lawsuit against Qualcomm for wrongful termination. For this reason, they would try very hard to eliminate employees in other manners that could not be labeled as "layoff". They would put all their effort into creating a condition where the employee would "resign" on his own. Then they wouldn't have to pay the employee any severance pay and they would not face any legal risk.

One method to accomplish this is to "to work the employee out". They give the employee an assignment that is impossible to complete and make him work hard and fruitlessly until the he gets exhausted and leaves on his own. If this method doesn't work, then they "PIP him out". This is accomplished by artificially lowering his performance grade and putting him on PIP. Then they give him an assignment that is impossible to complete in the given time, or is outside of his area of specialization, or has dependency on another group to deliver. This gives HR the justification to terminate the employee and if it comes to a lawsuit, they would claim that they gave the employee a chance to improve, but that he did not "perform".

To PIP an employee out, they will first encourage him to either resign on his own or go on PIP. HR would threaten that if employee doesn’t agree to either one, they would terminate him for insubordination. If he resigns, HR will be happy because they wouldn’t have to pay him any severance payment, he could not make any legal claim against Q, would not be eligible for unemployment benefits, and his health insurance will cease at the end of the month. If the employee decides to go on PIP, he gives them a chance to fabricate more bogus evidence against him in the manner which I described. Remember that no one has survived PIP in the past. Then they will terminate the employee at the end of PIP and will use the fabricated evidence in case he brings a lawsuit. HR will even be happier in this case because they wouldn’t have to pay the employee any severance payment, he could not make any legal claims, would not be eligible for unemployment benefits, his health insurance will cease at the end of the month, and Qualcomm could extract another month of intense work from the doomed employee which thinks if he worked harder he would survive.

I strongly encourage you to document all your accomplishments, deliveries, and your working condition in fine details and be prepared to confront HR if they try to put you on an unjustified PIP. You may even want to wear a concealed recording device when talking with HR or your managers. Note that this is legally admissible because your purpose is to prove a wrongdoing. Make sure to keep a copy of your evidence in a safe place because once you start to dispute and resist, they will put you on an administrative leave and will cut off your access to your emails and records. If you prove that you have a case against them, they will offer you their standard package which is 2-month of pay. In return, they will ask you waive all your rights to sue them. The 2-month pay does not depend on the number of years of your service, however, it is negotiable based on how strong of a case you have compiled against them. The payment is proportionate to the degree of risk they perceive in getting involved in a lawsuit and worst of all, a class action one. After all, they know how many labor laws they have been violating in their sweatshop every day and how much is at stake when they are exposed."

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @yre+G58ft9N

Post a reply

: