Thread regarding Baker Hughes Inc. layoffs

Halliburton, Baker Hughes in Talks to Sell $7 Billion of Assets to Carlyle Group (WSJ)

http://www.wsj.com/articles/halliburton-baker-hughes-in-talks-to-sell-assets-to-carlyle-group-1460658525

Private-equity firm Carlyle Group LP is in serious talks to buy a package of oilfield-services businesses from Halliburton Co. and Baker Hughes Inc. that could be valued at more than $7 billion, as the energy giants seek to overcome a Justice Department challenge to their planned merger.

Talks between Carlyle and the companies are far along, though not yet exclusive, people familiar with the matter said. The talks mark a shift for Halliburton and Baker Hughes, which for months have been focused on reaching a deal to sell the assets to General Electric Co.

GE and the energy companies have had problems agreeing on a price for the assets, some of the people said. GE is still in the mix, they added. Carlyle’s specialty, though, is creating stand-alone businesses from castoff units of larger companies.

The need for Baker Hughes and Halliburton to strike a divestiture deal took on increased urgency last week when the Justice Department filed an antitrust lawsuit challenging their $35 billion proposed deal, arguing it would threaten higher prices and reduce innovation in the oilfield-services industry. The two sides agreed to the deal in November 2014.

As always, the talks with Carlyle could fall apart before an agreement is reached, and even if there is one, there is no guarantee the government won’t stand in the way.

Last week, Justice Department antitrust chief Bill Baer said, “There’s no fix to this transaction.” He also said the gap between the two sides was “a chasm” and that settlement talks were never really under way because the government and the companies fundamentally disagreed on the competitive impacts of the merger.

In an attempt to alleviate regulatory concerns, Halliburton and Baker Hughes last year pledged to sell businesses with $5.2 billion in 2013 revenue; more recently, they proposed to sell additional businesses. Included in the divestiture portfolio are businesses that make various types of sophisticated drill bits and others that put the finishing touches on wells that are drilled but not yet producing.

Following the Justice Department filing, the companies said their divestiture plan would “facilitate the entry of new competition in markets in which products and services are being divested.” The companies said the government’s move to block their merger “is counterproductive, especially in the context of the challenges the U.S. and global energy industry are currently experiencing” and added they “intend to vigorously contest” the lawsuit.

Oilfield-services companies sell supplies and advice to energy producers and provide services such as drilling and hydraulic fracturing, the rock-cracking process that has enabled a boom in U.S. oil and gas production.

Since Halliburton and Baker Hughes agreed to combine, the industry has faced severe setbacks as persistently low crude prices have slashed demand. Many of the mom-and-pop oilfield services businesses that crowd the space have folded as drilling activity slowed in response to low energy prices, while others are offering their services at or below break-even prices.

The Justice Department said in its suit that Halliburton’s divestiture plan “appears to be among the most complex and riskiest remedies ever contemplated in an antitrust case,” requiring the separation of businesses that share facilities, employees, software, intellectual property and customer contracts.

In the absence of any settlement between the companies and the Justice Department, the outcome will be decided at trial.

Carlyle, based in Washington, D.C., is among the buyout firms with the most experience navigating the capital. The firm got its start in the late 1980s buying businesses shed by the government in a wave of privatizations, setting them up to run as independent concerns, and then selling them—often at hefty profits.

Over time, Carlyle adapted its experience in carving out defense contractors and other businesses from the federal government to plucking out-of-favor units from large corporations. In recent years, the firm has invested in deals to acquire units of United Technologies Corp., Illinois Tool Works Inc., Johnson & Johnson and DuPont Co.

Carlyle’s $4.9 billion acquisition in 2013 of DuPont’s paint-making unit, now known as Axalta Coating Systems Ltd., has been one of the most lucrative investments in the firm’s history.

The carve-out approach has helped Carlyle invest large sums from its private-equity business at a time when takeovers of entire companies have become less common amid high company valuations and the mixed performance of the last wave of big buyouts.

An acquisition of Halliburton and Baker Hughes’ businesses also would coincide with Carlyle’s increased presence in energy. The firm in 2012 acquired a controlling stake in energy-focused private-equity firm NGP and has since raised several pools of cash to invest in various facets of the industry.

by
| 2161 views | | 16 replies (last ) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+GUEHWHY

16 replies (most recent on top)

Hurry up something happen, just make Baker Hughes go a way!!!!!!!!!!!!!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @3yfs+GUEHWHY

Guys it won't happen. Last ditch efforts from 2 sinking ships. Stop grasping for hope when there is none with these 2 companies. It's over man.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2zqd+GUEHWHY

Whether GE or Carlyle buy certain assets one side benefit will be they can unload non core chemicals. GE has the previous experience of selling off its plastic resins business when it was no longer a fit. Carlyle knows where to find relevant buyers eager to pay a premium for businesses they can easily turn around.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2fnw+GUEHWHY

I just saved 15% on my car insurance! Stop blathering about things you can't control and call Geico today.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2xiv+GUEHWHY

Uncle Crackerhead is determined to get that 55 million dollar pay-off one way or the other!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2afy+GUEHWHY

With the Carlyle group, HAL is trying to show that this merger is pro-competition coz now Carlyle can participate in the services sector. As mentioned by DOJ in its filing, the divestiture package is very complex and limits the technological capability of a potential buyer especially in challenging markets that require superior technology and expertise.

Carlyle does not have any presence in EU and Middle East and with zero infrastructure/experience in major markets of oil industry, I cannot see how EU, Brazil and even the DOJ would want to approve.

Just a plain waste of time and investor's money.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2lev+GUEHWHY

Just send us our check and go away HAL.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1zos+GUEHWHY

Meant to say..agree with this poster....GUEHWHY-1xyp..

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1rxc+GUEHWHY

I agree with last poster. GE buying will make sense, that will keep GE (BHI) as one of three major players in OFS. Carlyle buying assets will not make any difference to the DOJ, HAL taking over BHI and selling pieces to Carlyle. That will leave the industry with two big, Schlumberger and HAL BHI.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1ssp+GUEHWHY

I'm betting the DOJ wants the pump divisions part of the sell negotiations and BHI/HAL will never consider it. Hal really wants the merger to have the pump tech of BH.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1ovq+GUEHWHY

GE buying BHI would make the number 3 service provider a larger number 3 service provider. HAL buying BHI would eliminate there being a number 3 service provider. WFT is a distant number 4 and is dying a slow agonizing death. And number 5 is Lord only knows and too small to even worry about.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1xyp+GUEHWHY

Now HAL started messing with BHI to do anything to escape 3.5B. After this, they may say Trump will buy the assets. There is no end. Just give up and send check.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1jti+GUEHWHY

GE wouldn't have a problem buying BHI in the eyes of the DOJ. There is not a lot of overlap between the two as far as having to divest overlapping product lines.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1seg+GUEHWHY

If both the DoJ and EU prevent the merge between HAL and BHI, then what is the probability they would allow GE to acquire BHI? ...answer is zero. The leadership teams of these companies are so distracted by the luster of gold that they're forgetting to take care of day-to-day business. Enter SLB stage right..!!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1pxd+GUEHWHY

Dem judges can and will be bought. Everyone has they price.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @maj+GUEHWHY

And tha makes less than no sense. HAL and BHI have always said they would only sell assets in conjunction with getting regulatory approval. And DOJ is suing HAL to block the deal which means there won't be any way they can acquire unless they prevail in court. And that ain't happening. If they can't convince customers the deal is good for customers how in the hell are they going to convince a judge of that and even if pigs were to fly they ain't gonna fly any time soon. So this Carlyle crap is just Alice in Wonderland nonsense. I think BHI went up today (and HAL didn't) because of the GE buying all of BHI rumor.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @hga+GUEHWHY

Post a reply

: