Thread regarding Intel Corp. layoffs

Netflix is more brutal than Intel...

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/06/19/magazine/can-netflix-survive-in-the-new-world-it-created.html

McCord also convinced Hastings that he should ask himself a few times a year whether he would hire the same person in the same job if it opened up that day. If the answer was no, Netflix would write a larger check and let the employee go. “If you are going to insist on high performance,” McCord says, “then you have to get rid of the notion of retention. You’ll have to fire some really nice, hard-working people. But you have to do it with dignity.

“I held the hands of people weeping, saying, ‘I want to be here forever,’ ” McCord says. “I would tell them, ‘Nothing lasts forever.’ I would say to Reed, ‘I love them, too, but it is our job to be sure that we always have the right people.’ ”

by
| 1250 views | | 8 replies (last ) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+HUnLtdx

8 replies (most recent on top)

The whole "you need to getting promo'd'" thing worked well when we had 100s of new hires feeding in at the bottom and the company was growing, creating new jobs for the higher grade levels. It all breaks down when there's no growth and no RCG supply at the bottom. Similar to Ponzi scheme collapse.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @okh+HUnLtdx

To get promoted at Intel you need two years minimum exceeding expectation. Which high performers will wait that long for recognition?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @sng+HUnLtdx

This should be obvious, but I guess I have to explain it to underpaid morons.

If a company has no growth, your career will stall because there will be very limited opportunities for promotion.

Thought experiment - if more people were promoted without growth - eventually everyone would become a grade 10 with no junior people left. You need growth to hire more people and promote within.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @anl+HUnLtdx

To keep top performers Intel also need to offer places to move up, other wise the top performers would end up staying in the same grade and be victims of the HR statistics. But with Intel insisting in colocation, sending jobs to low cost geographies, etc then many high performers are left with the choice of relocating, or changing careers to something that is not fun/challenging/appealing or staying working hard and trying to somehow keep performing and maybe get recognized and saved from the statitistics (did not work out for me)

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @chq+HUnLtdx

IMO the only way to live your professional life is to ask yourself the same question every quarter - is Intel the best place for me to be? - and always have a short list of companies you'd work for second, third, etc. beyond Intel. You may postpone for financial reasons, but if the answer comes back "no" a few times, get serious and get out. Intel wants everyone to be committed and heads down until it decides it no longer needs you. Don't fall in love with the company, any company unless it's one you start and control the stock and board.

I was lucky to be at Intel at a time when you could trust Andy and Gordon, and could work hard. But when that changed I asked to be on the VSP list, took my package and it was a very happy day.

Sad to see Intel today, but there's middle managers at C- and VP levels. No backbone on the board, and the world has changed around Intel while it searches for the next $10B 60% profit high volume market.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @snd+HUnLtdx

You want top performers you have to offer top compensation period

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @buc+HUnLtdx

I thought intel was a charity giving cush jobs based on seniority and not deliverables?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @nue+HUnLtdx

It's business, man! Not a country club. Intel needs to rid itself of the good old boy's club. It has decimated the company. Every decision made has been the wrong one and nobody has the guts to step up to denounce them.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @mmr+HUnLtdx

Post a reply

: