Thread regarding National Oilwell Varco Inc. layoffs

Changes to the management structure needed

I want to see some changes made to the management structure. I am new to NOV, so I don't know all of the history yet, but I can see that the company is top heavy. In the last round of layoffs, I didn't see any managers clearing out their desks. Now we are trying to carry on the same work load with fewer "hands on" people. The managers have more time to schedule meetings so that they know what is going on, but this only reduces the amount of time the "hands on" people have to get things done.

I believe that the layoffs were said to have been done in a "smart" way so that NOV would be poised to grow when the market rebounded. This "smart" way was to keep all of the management in place. But in my opinion, this is not the smart way. When the market rebounds, we will need to focus on making products, not training the new hires. It is easier to promote from within a growing group than it is to bring in a bunch of new entry level people. Also, if we are trying to reduce expenses, isn't it better to look at the cost of salaries?

What is done, is done. We are left with a greater percentage of managers than we had before the layoff. What can be done about it? Have those managers get out on the floor and contribute, getting their hands dirty, learning how the tools and software really work. Assign them tasks that haven't been done because of lack of resources. The managers that don't have anything to contribute can stand in line at the next "random" drug screen, and hopefully grab a couple of boxes to pack up their personal items.

by
| 2012 views | | 6 replies (last ) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+IFwuXqD

6 replies (most recent on top)

Who cares. Not me

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @4uhw+IFwuXqD

Half of the SR VP's have no clue on how to turn this around because 95% of the other VP's were given the positions without having any product knowledge or management skills to make the tough decisions

Now the hands on people who really made NOV grow are the one to suffer

NOV was at one time a great company to work for during my 28 years but they grew too fast and the younger guys didn't want to take advise from the hard core get it done employees

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @xez+IFwuXqD

The last emails that I saw about company structure listed around 7 Sr VPs and 16 VPs. The manager I had focused on saving money and not improving performance. The attitude was that cutting time allowed for a job was the same as improving performance. No equipment was being maintained even when there was no production. If NOV ever gets busy again like it was in the spring of 2012, they are going to fail miserably. But, as I understand it, NOV's customer service was atrocious. I actually enjoyed working for NOV as the people that I worked with were nice. I don't know what the deal was with management though. Either they were just plain stupid or scared, or both. Good luck to those left in NOV. It does not look good and NOV's leadership is being reactive and not proactive.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @fad+IFwuXqD

NOV are Clueless, getting rid of all your experienced people . Hoping that your useless managers will

Pull you through when orders pick up !!! . Most of the Managers I met at NOV will only bring the company down.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @vah+IFwuXqD

You are so right about NOV being top-heavy.

Also, NOV has too many bean counters. Many things have been absorbed by Corporate, but already overstaffed G&A personnel have been left at the locations.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @oiz+IFwuXqD

Not bad, pretty truthful and a sign of how unprepared NOV will be when the turnaround takes place. Sadly we have not hit bottom yet and the recovery will be a very slow one. Therefore this is why you see so much management being protected while the hands on people have felt the most pain during these layoffs. NOV did not use to be this top heavy. They grew too fast over the last 7 years and we're not prepared to react quickly enough to this severe downturn. They need to transforms themselves and "right size" the organization to be a $3B - $4B a year company for the next few years. Most of the backlog will be gone by the end of 2016 so $3B may be a little optimistic. This harse reality is a far cry from 2014 when NOV was a $20B+ size company. How much management do you really need to support a $3B vs. $20B a year company? That is a tough question for a recovery that is still a long way from now

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @jkc+IFwuXqD

Post a reply

: