Thread regarding Sears layoffs

Seritage Growth Properties: The List Of The 17 Kmart Portfolio Stores Being Closed

Summary

Sears is closing 17 Kmart stores within Seritage's portfolio and paying a termination fee.

The base rent on these properties averages approximately $3.40 per square foot, allowing for significant improvement with new tenants.

However, these 17 stores are likely lower-tier properties and this will be a test of Seritage's ability to improve the value and revenues from its lower-tier properties after Sears leaves.

Sears is likely to terminate the leases of many more Kmart and Sears stores in the future as its per store sales have been crumbling for years.

There was recently news that Sears Holdings (NASDAQ:SHLD) was closing 64 Kmart stores. As well, Seritage Growth Properties (NYSE:SRG) mentioned in an 8-K filing that Sears was terminating leases on 17 unprofitable stores and paying Seritage a termination fee as a result. Although the list of Seritage portfolio stores affected was not announced, the stores can be determined by cross-referencing the Kmart closure list with Seritage's property list.

List Of Lease Terminations

The 17 Kmart stores that are scheduled to be closed and are part of Seritage's portfolio are listed below. The Sears Holdings leases of those stores add up to 1.73 million square feet of space as per Seritage's S-11 filing. This square footage number does not include the portion that was already leased to third parties at the time. It appears that there has been no change in the footage leased by third parties at these 17 stores between the S-11 filing and the year-end 10-K report.

There are a couple stores located in cities where Seritage owns more than one properties, so I've noted the address beside it.

Cullman

AL

98,522

Sierra Vista

AZ

86,079

East Fry Blvd

Thornton

CO

190,174

Chicago

IL

118,816

Kedzie Square

Springfield

IL

84,180

Elkhart

IN

86,479

Merrillville

IN

108,339

Houma

LA

96,710

New Iberia

LA

91,653

Alpena

MI

118,200

Manistee

MI

87,848

Sault Ste. Marie

MI

92,650

Kearney

NE

86,479

Deming

NM

96,571

Harlingen

TX

91,653

Yakima

WA

97,251

Riverton

WY

94,840

Lease Termination Effect

Each year Sears Holdings is allowed to terminate the master lease for properties with annual rent payments that add up to close to $30 million per year if the EBITDAR for those properties over the past four fiscal quarters is less than its rent expense. Sears will pay a termination fee of $5.8 million (aggregate annual base rent) plus estimated operating expenses to Seritage as well as continuing to pay normal rent until January 2017 for the 17 Kmart stores affected.

Fitch previously estimated that there were 35 properties in Seritage's portfolio where the Sears Holdings' store had EBITDAR that was less than rent. However, Sears's sales (and consequently its gross margin dollars) have been falling faster than Sears can cut costs, so there are likely more properties with EBITDAR less than rent expense now. Thus I would not be surprised to see Sears exercising the termination clause for more and more properties as its per store sales continue to dwindle.

Seritage's Challenges

One of the items that has attracted investors to Seritage is the potential for Seritage to achieve significantly higher rental rates for its properties once Sears leaves. The base rent for the 17 Kmart stores appears to be around only $3.40 per square foot, so any new tenants would be paying significantly more. However, Seritage does still need to actually find tenants for any empty properties.

These 17 properties should serve as a good indication of whether Seritage is actually able to fill its recaptured space. Given the poor profitability of these stores (not just absolute profitability which can be attributed to Kmart's struggles, but also relative profitability to other Kmarts), many are likely in less desirable locations. Any new tenant can probably achieve higher sales levels than Kmart, but may have challenges getting these new stores to above average levels of profitability for their chain.

Thus, if Seritage is able to find tenants for these 17 properties at a reasonable rate and within a reasonable timeframe, it bodes well for the transition of the rest of the properties, some of which would be more desirable. If Seritage struggles to fill the space, then Seritage could be stuck with a lot of lower-tier inventory if Sears continues terminating its leases.

I've also found brochures for some of these locations indicating that Seritage may have been attempting to gauge interest from new tenants wanting part of the Kmart space prior to the termination notice. Seritage has the ability to recapture 50% of the space for most of its properties, apparently without needing to pay a fee. One brochure indicates rent of $7.50 per square foot for the 50% space.

Conclusion

With Sears Holdings unable to turnaround its business for many years it is now in the position where it has a number of stores where EBITDAR is less than rent. Thus, Sears has started to terminate the leases on some of its stores in Seritage's portfolio, starting with the 17 Kmarts mentioned above.

by
| 949 views | | 5 replies (last ) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+JwRVm1b

5 replies (most recent on top)

Eddie owns about half of Seritage, or a little more. The spin off of properties was done neither to save Sears nor slow its death. It was done for him to separate the assets from the main company before it collapses.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1vvz+JwRVm1b

The large lump sum of cash from the deal made it worth it. It obviously wasn't a move to SAVE the company, it was made to slow down its death. If you look at the moves eddy is making it all makes sense from that perspective. Remember, even if Sears dies eddy still makes money off it. The only real risk he has is if it dies too quickly. If I remember correctly he owns a large chunk of seritage. If they can slow down the death of Sears/Kmart JUST enough so that they can get a steady stream of stores, they'll make a killing. If Sears and Kmart die too quickly however, they may have an issue because they'll have no rent revenue and potentially they'll have a bunch of empty lots.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1hwm+JwRVm1b

the stores will be knocked down. The land has value and there will substantial costs to build new stores

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ejw+JwRVm1b

Does anyone see the absurdity in this? Kmart used to own this land. Then they gave the land to a new spunoff company-seritage, and started renting the land.

If they had never done that, they would not being paying millions to end the lease early!

If anything paying these termination fees will just cause Sears to go bankrupt more quickly. What were they thinking???

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @krg+JwRVm1b

Delicious report.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @zvt+JwRVm1b

Post a reply

: