4plw- Roger that! I've worked at a number of Chevron sites where unions were present, and in EVERY case, more angst, effort, and energy was expended on perceived/supposed slights "endured" by union represented labor to the point that it became their primary function! They're typically like a bunch of old women, with nothing better to do than go about, wringing their hands, b--ching and moaning about which ever grudge at the time was foremost in their (sic) minds. The plant (or district) manager, constantly seeking cost parity with their non-union (organizational) "competition, was powerless to lower labor costs (typically, one of the largest cost components in the budget), but such efforts just spawned even MORE rage and time-consuming retribution from the Union! Union slugs infect the cost structure, making "efficiency" virtually impossible, and they destroy morale, with their constant whining and complaining. BUT,... the presence of an on-site union DOES provide the stupid and uneducated the chance to shoot their mouths off, and impress, at least themselves, by elevating even the most trivial "wrong" to the attention of Management. And, of course,... there were the near constant parades of (free) "lunches". It is no wonder that the Democrats are so drawn to unions and their accompanying nonsense.