Thread regarding Cisco Systems Inc. layoffs

Ever notice how revenue declines are a sign of a "challenging business environment" yet revenue gains signal how brilliant the CEO executed.

by
| 2239 views | | 14 replies (last ) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+KpBDcd6

14 replies (most recent on top)

http://www.lightreading.com/carrier-sdn/sd-wan/ahujas-next-chapter-is-versa/d/d-id/728405?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1yvj+KpBDcd6

a bloodbath in highest cost location SJC looks possible even inevitable next spring.

bxb is already dead - long live bxb. rtp might survive as a lot of marketing/TAC/AS gets run out of there for big east coast clients.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1otg+KpBDcd6

today lot of reqs where opened in bangalore and few in chennai. some of the teams in blr have suffered attrition and are presently understaffed. some are overstaffed though esp on the manual side of test.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1qdc+KpBDcd6

I was unlucky enough to see the decline of Nortel and Alcatel-lucent, now Cisco is showing many of the same signs.I have to say that the morale and people just doing the minimum effort is just as I have seen before.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1ubl+KpBDcd6

Cisco needs to cut expensives. They've already cut headcount so either another round of layoffs or some huge program will be defunded. They is no other option at this point.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ohl+KpBDcd6

The scariest stat is 7% down on switching. Without switching there is no Cisco. The company is too big to turn around now and the services business is way too immature and under invested to make any real impact to the bottom line. Cisco won't sell service that aren't profitable from day one..... Well good luck competing with HCL, Atos, HPE, IBM and all the others then!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ysv+KpBDcd6

Ever noticed in the annual report that just came out the ELT gave themselves big bonuses and RSUs for this lackluster results.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ufk+KpBDcd6

@irm - Why did Chambers stay as long as he did? His Cisco clearly missed several huge market transitions and failed to make critical infrastructure and R&D investments, his organizational structure and leadership culture were/are a mess, and his financial and staffing strategies created a talent vacuum. Why didn't he leave while there was still plenty of time for someone else to right the ship?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @qqw+KpBDcd6

Why do you think Chambers left when he did? Absolutely tried to protect his legacy. He couldn't turn the company around, so he split, and made the implosion Chuck's problem.

Ask most execs, and they'll tell you Chuck won't be around long. Unwinnable job.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @irm+KpBDcd6

book to bill ratio is smaller than 1....this indicates further sequential and YoY declines i would imagine.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @lqu+KpBDcd6

nortel I think collapsed from $10+b annual to nothing in 4 years. towards the end they even stopped coffee and paper cups in the pantry's ... you bring own mug and own coffee

same story for lucent, except that it was even more messed up.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ewg+KpBDcd6

Nortel who? How fast did they lose relevance?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @pze+KpBDcd6

friend who is a ex-Nortel veteran says this is a repeat of nortel and lucent circa-2000

thats not a good sign imo :(

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @fnv+KpBDcd6

Actually, one good quarter Chucky specifically said the performance was due to economic tailwinds so we shouldn't pat ourselves on the back too much.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @lre+KpBDcd6

Post a reply

: