Thread regarding Qualcomm Inc. layoffs

which company is better Qualcomm or Broadcom?

any opinions?

by
| 2171 views | | 8 replies (last ) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+L2szwlY

8 replies (most recent on top)

overall, Q is probablly better. Avago err, broadcom buys companies, uses the current technology until it is obsolete, then sells the bits. on and on it goes with Avago.

from an investment point of view, Avago does great for short term stock appreciation.

in every way, AVGO has been a better stock to own then QCOM

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @batu+L2szwlY

@1cmo

Tell us more about these groups?

What building?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2thd+L2szwlY

Corruption at qcom knows no bounds. If you are in the right group, four years from staff to principal. Other groups you can actually do good work (there are probably three groups like this- rest is buddy-buddy)

But if you are in one of three interesting groups, the work can be quite interesting from engineering perspective. Good luck in finding these groups!!!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1cmo+L2szwlY

Qualcomm is going to become another Broadcom with corruption

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1vcx+L2szwlY

As an engineer? Qualcomm

As a business person that likes does mergers acquisitions and layoffs....Broadcom...

Avago doesn't really do engineering. They buy companies, chop them up, sell them. And repeats the process.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1wmi+L2szwlY

Qualcomm is better.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @mpj+L2szwlY

Qualcomm = corruption

Broadcom = lack of technology

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @wlh+L2szwlY

Both s---, no ivew calls.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @lpg+L2szwlY

Post a reply

: