Thread regarding Qualcomm Inc. layoffs

Apple Takes a Bite Out of Qualcomm: Timing of lawsuit throws completion of NXP Semiconductors deal into question, along with future royalties

Qualcomm has survived many legal challenges to its patent-driven business model. The suit filed by Apple is a tougher test.

Investors took note, wiping $13 billion off of Qualcomm’s market value since news of the suit hit late Friday. One reason is Apple represents about one-quarter of Qualcomm’s licensing revenue, estimates Christopher Caso of CLSA. It is a formidable foe with $132 billion in net cash.

More importantly, the Apple suit hits Qualcomm at a terrible time: Qualcomm is already in the thick of it with regulators in Korea, Europe and the U.S.—all of whom are examining the company’s business practices regarding the deep well of patents that go to the heart of most wireless devices operating today. Licenses from these patents generate about 80% of the company’s pretax profit.

Qualcomm is also trying to get regulators to sign off on its $39 billion acquisition of NXP Semiconductors . This is the company’s biggest M&A deal to date, as it will add much needed diversity to a business that still relies heavily on the slowing smartphone market.

The lawsuit makes clear that Apple has been discussing Qualcomm with those agencies, many of whom have to sign off on the NXP acquisition for it to proceed. Qualcomm was expecting to complete the deal by the end of this year, but the fact that its stock has now slid back below its price from before the deal was announced suggests that shareholders now see a strong risk of a delay.

That—plus the prospect of having to lower its royalty rates for a key customer—have placed another cloud of uncertainty over Qualcomm. The company’s future depends on passing this test.

by
| 2969 views | | 6 replies (last ) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+LujgCJ2

6 replies (most recent on top)

The novelty of a smartphone is gone. An Android phone is as easy to use as an iPhone. The only advantage an iPhone has is that apps are usually released there first, but that advantage will go way. Apple probably knows all of this and at the same time don't have anything new. At least QC is trying to make new tech to find the next big thing.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1wzh+LujgCJ2

You guys can paint a groom and doom picture for apple as you like, but truth to the matter is Qualcomm needed those 1 billion rebate more than apple needed it. Care to figure out the impact to Qualcomm bottom line had Qualcomm paid the rebate?

Have some financial acumen.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1isg+LujgCJ2

+1 @LujgCJ2-1tcv

Google's Pixel was very popular. Snapdragon 835 can run native X86 apps with Microsoft's magic VM implementation.

Apple is so afraid and trembling in the wind..HAHAHAHA

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1kjw+LujgCJ2

This lawsuit shows just how desperate Apple is: sales are dropping, no big inovation, cheaper competition with good products. Suing your key suplier is sign of weakness not strenght. Hopefully they don't end up as BlackBerry.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1tcv+LujgCJ2

@LujgCJ2-hlu your post would be exactly true if patents didn't exist. Once the government grants a company a monopoly through patent, your case is not as clear cut.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1yqh+LujgCJ2

Companies who use QC's tech sign legal agreements. The agreements probably ask for too much, but the parties agreed to them. If they didn't like the agreement, there was nothing stopping them from developing the tech themselves. I think Apple knows this. This is just a matter of Apple taking advantage of QC's current legal situation to get a better deal. Apple probably knows Intel can't develop something better.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @hlu+LujgCJ2

Post a reply

: