Looks they are building an empire with the addition of DTG resourcethe same group. I have no idea what have they done before. Any insights folks?
15 replies (most recent on top)
@MAborUu-9vaa : good one :)
What I couldn't understand still is that even that there is no life there for a very long time, and of course not being wendy at all, how could this planet survive all the demolitions that occurred without being impacted.
Life on Mars. The planet Mars does not support sustained lifeform, nothing grows, nothing has ever originated from it and life expectancy is short. When will Cisco wake up and realise that it is rot like this that is crippling it.
Last poster thank you for the honesty. At least we have folks who will say it how it is. There is hope.
Let me be honest here, unfortunately I am part of this organization, and I am really ashamed to tell anyone that I am. The comments here are absolutely true, we are building fake slides to show some fabricated progress and results, as long as we report to her something that she can talk about, we are safe, unfortunately I am stuck and found myself here with this leader that can get away with building such a fake organization after the other.
Looking outside of course and will jump as soon as I find something that pays the bills.
DTG was full of g12/13/14. people on front like with accountability can't move from g9/10 - something is wrong in people deal.
I agree, there's too many VPs that aren't being held accountable. There's 5x more directors basically they just want the compensation but have no interest in growing the actual business.
@2kui fully agree, they are just justifying their existence with some fabricated results to show activity and engagement, no added value to the field, and that's how the field feels actually, it's another useless group under this VP.
Just another example of VPs justifying their existence with an overly generic software play of smoke, mirrors and unicorn tears. They do a bunch of flag waving with big buzzwords to the ELT who, not knowing any better, approve 100s of millions. Which have no restrictions or strings to require an ROI within X months/years. Meanwhile the execs get more stock and big bonuses during the first two years and can easily explain away why their leadership had nothing to do with the product failing.
Feedback from field is that they add no value, unfortunately we keep building these teams and dismantle them later.
lost folk trying to sell bad software on less pay than theyd get elsewhere in the industry. You should pity them.
Hard working people who are able to sell SaaS, responsible for recurrent revenue on annuity.
Save some money and use that to add a few more quota carrying people rather than PowerPoint junkies like this group, uk or otherwise.
Fly around the world, talking hypothetically about things that they arent qualified to implement. Complete waste of resources.
I see it's 1st of April ... ;-)
CDA team? Yes, good people doing a good job.