Does anyone have any insight on to what degree these call reviews matter when it comes to deciding who goes and who stays?
I keep noticing "mistakes" on these reviews, like the reviewer is on auto-pilot, completing form in a cookie-cutter fashion, and not actually listening to the call. Just received a review where reviewer, after supposedly "listening" to a call where I am calling to inform a member that they are "graduating" from the program, in which the reviewer claims "missed opportunities to schedule a follow up call." Umm....yeah. That's because I just got through informing member of graduation - she understood there would be no future calls, Einstein. Were you even listening to the call? Or maybe checking FB or watching TV while completing audits?
This is just one example, but my question is, do we need to take these very seriously - or with a grain of salt - when it comes to job stability? (Or is this a moot point considering job stability seems to have gone out the window regardless)?
It's enough that we are being micromanaged like I have never experienced before in my professional life, but we also have to worry about incompetent, likely unqualified, reviewers (no offense intended if you are a reviewer who actually tries to listen and provide constructive, useful feedback - all I seem to get are the ones looking to take off points for insignificant nonsense, like I'm a kid in grade school and they've got the red pen in hand. They are not actually listening to each call's unique circumstances, rather trying to fill out a cookie-cutter form and find things wrong, without taking into account the bigger picture - how you are actually trying to help someone. Not good for morale, having an incompetent hit squad over our shoulders).