Thread regarding Intel Corp. layoffs

Intel stock the same price as it was in July 1999. WOW, just Wow!

18 years of dead money.

by
| 2147 views | | 9 replies (last ) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+Of8hieW

9 replies (most recent on top)

Such a waste of investments and hard work over the last 20 years. I wish our board was more active to take action. We are stuck ever since our founders left and Andy stepped down as CEO

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @4odp+Of8hieW

Don't forget the very generous focal budget while the executives make out like the bandits they are

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1gms+Of8hieW

All that hard work.

Late nights.

Weekends.

Yet the stock is stuck in the mud.

Time to get rewarded at another company that has actual growth.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1zyu+Of8hieW

It is true that Intel had two stock splits since 1999... one in 1999 and one 2000.

What is being left out is that Intel had the biggest stock crash of 2000 and HAS NEVER COME BACK.

http://money.cnn.com/2000/10/12/investing/q_bigdrop/

Intel Stock Splits:

  • April 12, 1999 - 2 for 1

  • July 31, 2000 - 2 for 1

(Yes, that is that last one.)

Stock Crash:

Intel:

  • Sept 1st, 2000 - 73.94 (post splits)

  • Oct 18th, 2000 - 14.46

  • Today 34.24

  • Difference: 19.78 in non-inflation-adjusted dollars

Apple:

  • Sept 29th - 9.01

  • Today 147.77

  • Difference: 138.76 in non-inflation-adjusted dollars.

OP is correct dead money.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1tuz+Of8hieW

Think of the monopoly and being the largest and most profitable chip company for decades!

Was printing money on x86 monopoly to the tune of billions per quarter.

Anyone now not believe that CRB, PSO, and BK are not the greatest three stooges of technology?

In the past 15 years look what Samsung and TSMC have become!

Intel hasn't leveraged its silicon leadership in anything, missing every big thing. They threw their riches at anything and everything and miss executed in the few right strategies.

Now the x86 wall is finally crumbling, leadership in silicon gone. The decline will be really fast over the next two years.

Can't wait to see the next ACT from the clown

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @yfz+Of8hieW

OP is correct. So what if it is split adjusted. I pulled the numbers below, this is market cap end of year (for this year, it is today's value), errors are +-5%.

Stock splits do not change market cap, if they split, 2x the shares and share price is 50% so market cap stays the same. OP is 100% correct that there is no additional value in Intel since 1998-1999. Sure there was cash to be made on the dips and peaks, but holding Intel long since 1999 = dead money.

Year Market Cap ($B)

1996 66

1997 148

1998 138

1999 252

2000 436

2001 186

2002 114

2003 170

2004 141

2005 157

2006 107

2007 144

2008 120

2009 76

2010 112

2011 104

2012 126

2013 107

2014 122

2015 175

2016 160

2017 160

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @eih+Of8hieW

It's split adjusted genius.

Don't take my word for it... you can look it up yourself - but you won't because you're a blind fanboy.

Enjoy your dead money.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @mng+Of8hieW

@jmy

Dividends are barely enough to keep up with inflation. This stock is a dog.

The board of directors should be ashamed of this performance.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @yel+Of8hieW

At least intel pays dividends.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @jmy+Of8hieW

Post a reply

: