Thread regarding General Electric Co. layoffs

A Note to GE Leadership

  • Get rid of your contractors that do the work.

  • Get rid of solid performing employees in the U.S. or Western Europe - they are too expensive.

  • Save the company money by eliminating all travel.

  • Give up your desk phone.

  • Reduce employee awards and cap them for the year.

  • Consider hand written notes to award employees instead of financial awards.

  • Cut benefits and health insurance.

  • Kill the pension for new workers.

  • Under fund the pension for existing workers.

All while we continue to layoff so that the fat cats can get bonuses and cash they don't deserve.

If you're a CEO of GE and you make more than $100K a DAY yet you are the worst performer for your entire duration as CEO against other peer industrials, then folks we really have something very wrong.

Hell, even our internal goal as a company is to reach $2/EPS which is not even an internal goal. It might be a goal in Finance but not something the troops are going to rally around.

Leadership is so out of touch that they think that is an acceptable goal for everyday employees. Wow, nothing like making rich people richer as a motivator to get up in the morning.

Yes, it is the basis of Corporations to make their share holders money but it should not be our internal marching song.

How about we make the best products in the world or power the most efficiently or make aircraft the safest? Corp greed at its finest while the fat cats get rich raping the company and the every day middle class gets the shaft if they're lucky otherwise gets shown the door.

by
| 3915 views | | 7 replies (last ) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+PgOKoD8

7 replies (most recent on top)

Of course you know that you can't have a successful business without fat cats.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2ave+PgOKoD8

GE has real problems based on the actions of Immelt and the board (I have voted against all of them for the past several years). Digital Industrial is a worthy goal but the business should have shown it could make money at it before announcing to the world that you are counting on it for growth. Additive 3D printing technology is a big factor for the future but it makes no money now and won't for a few years. Why add more oil companies to the portfolio? Clearly a loser as long as fracking is available to drive oil costs lower every time there is a surge in price. Keep focused on renewables. Getting rid of all the Capital businesses greatly reduced the cash flow that keeps the veins filled and heart pumping. Now the industrials have to make up for it and don't know how (hopefully they will learn fast). And what happened to all the $ from the sale of the Capital businesses? Did everything go at a loss? I did not disagree with the reduction but that was an absolutely a huge mistake if so.

I would not begrudge the huge salaries and incentive packages that our corporate officers make if they could drive the company in the right direction. Obviously they did not. I don't know how Immelt can sleep at night knowing what he did to the business at a huge profit for himself. I know many in the executive ranks. There is a feeling of entitlement there that is unhealthy for the business. They don't walk the talk. That has to change.

Hopefully under the leadership of Flannery, the business will make the right moves. He has to be humble and one of the first orders of business has to be addressing the huge corporate overhead. I think Boston was a good step. Not because of being centered in a technology region but more because the move reduced the executive ranks at the top. Need to rid the business of a lot of very expensive dead wood and focus on the areas that are making money. GRC has already been whacked big time and I think Crotonville also needs to be greatly trimmed. Classes there are regarded as a boondoggle. I've been there several times and primarily recall the white house where the alcohol flows freely, not the things we learned in class. The investment allocations are extremely lop sided right now. An excess of the $ available are going to unproven digital and additive technologies and our businesses are getting behind the competition in other areas because they can't invest. This will lead to loss of revenue in the future. Where I work now, revenue is $200M+ per year with consistent year over year growth and op profit of 30%+. This year our investment budget is < $1M. How can you stay ahead of the competition with that kind of investment?

Bottom line is that Flannery has to a lot of hard things to lead the business to solid revenue in order to regain investor confidence. Best of luck to him and I'll be helping in anyway possible. My pension, a good chunk of investments, and my pride in the business count on it.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2bwy+PgOKoD8

Some officers and SEB should go too. The company is not bigger during Immelt's tenant but the number of them doubled. With less noise GE can be much more agile.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @yen+PgOKoD8

I don't mind that GE is all about the EPS. They are just not smart enough to not say it out loud. Immelt's got us into a bad situation but we can't do anything about that now. They do need to reduce cost but should start with all the interns and leadership programs. Noble effort but we need to focus on experienced employees that work there way up through the ranks. Next they should layoff those that just don't fit in this social media controlled business model. I am one of those but i stick around to see if they can offer up separation pay for those that they screwed. Finally the biggest layoff's should be the EP level. For the most part EP's can't motivate and lack domain knowledge necessary to turn things around. I know there may be some innocent let go but we just need to pull the band-aid off all at once and get about business.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @wfd+PgOKoD8

I need TP for my bunghole!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @qli+PgOKoD8

That's crotonville for ya world class box tickers

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @vhb+PgOKoD8

Facebook executives: "we connect everyone in the world"

Rolls Royce executives: "our vision is a better power for a changing world"

DHL executives: "we deliver things, but we want to be the logistics company for the world"

GE executives: "our goal is to deliver 2 bucks to shareholders"

... WHAT?

Craps like "We make real what matters" is way better, not to say you can't even deliver the nonsense your saying.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @veu+PgOKoD8

Post a reply

: