Thread regarding Walmart layoffs

It’s the law. And one that’s Walmart is breaking.

Age discrimination in the workplace persists as a serious and pervasive problem. Charges of age discrimination spiked during the Great Recession. It’s not easy to win if you file a complaint, but there are ways to bolster your case. Read on to learn about the law that protects you and what you can do if you or someone you know becomes a victim of age discrimination.

The Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA) is a federal law that protects workers and job applicants age 40 and over from age-based discrimination in all aspects of employment. The ADEA does not apply to elected officials, independent contractors or military personnel. The law does apply to:

Employers with at least 20 employees

Employment agencies

The federal government

State and local government (though remedies are often limited)

Labor organizations with at least 25 members

The ADEA prohibits age discrimination in decisions about hiring, firing, layoffs, pay, benefits, promotions, demotions, performance reviews or any other condition of employment.

Under the ADEA, employers can’t:

Mention age or say that a certain age is preferred in job ads and recruiting materials; it is questionable but not automatically illegal to ask for date of birth or graduation on a job application

Set age limits for training programs

Retaliate against you if you file charges of age discrimination or help the government investigate charges

Force you to retire at a certain age (except for a few narrow exceptions)

The law also prohibits policies and practices that have a “disparate impact” on older workers. These are policies that appear to be age-neutral but fall more harshly on older workers. An example is a school district that announces it won’t hire teachers with more than 20 years of experience. Policies or practices that have a disproportionately adverse impact on older workers are unlawful unless the employer can prove they are based on a reasonable factor other than age.

You have the right to pursue a claim if you feel you are a victim of age discrimination. Judging older workers on the basis of age rather than abilities is wrong, and age discrimination can have devastating effects on the financial security of workers at the time and into retirement. It’s a hard case to bring and a hard one to win, though. It can also be emotionally and financially draining, and you may never get your day in court. Talk with your family, and take the uphill nature of the battle into account.

Before you file a complaint, consider negotiating with your employer first or using your company’s established grievance system. If your case is strong, you may be able to persuade your employer to settle with you. Research shows employers are inclined to settle out of court in cases where employees have solid evidence of age bias.

If you decide to move forward, it’s important to have a strong case. Make sure to document remarks by your managers and others that you perceive as discriminatory. Keep emails and any other documentation that helps your case. Then take these steps:

File a charge with the federal Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC)

This step comes before you can file a lawsuit. Call the EEOC at 800-669-4000 or visitthe EEOC website for details on how to file a charge. If at all possible, file a charge within 180 days of the discriminatory action or when you first became aware of the discriminatory action, whichever occurred first. In some states, the time limit for filing a charge is extended to 300 days. However, filing within 180 days is recommended, to be on the safe side.

The EEOC will notify the employer of the charge and will investigate it. If the EEOC determines that the charge has merit, it will attempt conciliation. This means the agency will try to persuade the employer to voluntarily eliminate and remedy the discrimination. If conciliation is not successful, the EEOC will decide whether to take legal action on behalf of the charging party. It is important to note that the EEOC does so in an extremely small percentage of the charges it receives.

The EEOC website offers more information on age discrimination.

Find a lawyer

Get in touch with an employment lawyer in your state to talk about the merits of your claim and what you need to do under state law. You can find employment lawyers through the National Employment Lawyers Association: www.nela.org.

File your lawsuit

After the EEOC has terminated its proceedings on a charge, the agency will issue a “right to sue” letter. In age discrimination cases, you don’t need to wait for this letter before filing a case in federal court. You can file your lawsuit at any time from 60 days after you file with the EEOC and up to 90 days after you receive the “right to sue” letter.

The ADEA offers important workplace protections, but it doesn’t stop some employers from running afoul of the law’s requirements. Be aware of your rights, and then carefully consider the pros and cons of pursuing a case before you act.

by
| 2629 views | | 13 replies (last ) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+Pp0cytY

13 replies (most recent on top)

Walmart is not breaking any laws. Even the HR associates that have been laid off will clearly tell you that. They can let you go with or without cause. They can essentially say your job is being deleted and then turn around the next day and hire someone else to do the same thing, or transfer another associate into that role to do the same thing and they are totally within their legal expanse to do that. It might be hard to accept but that is the truth.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @5grg+Pp0cytY

There's a slight chance that WM will try to settle with the plaintiffs, especially if the evidence against them is "iron-clad", and not merely circumstantial. However, keep in mind that your attorney (if working on contingency) will take 30-50% of that. So, if WM settles for $70K, you'll be left with $35-49K. Depending on your prior salary and tenure, you may be better off signing that damn severance and calling it a day. Otherwise, your case will be a never-ending battle of he said/she said, and I'll give you one guess who's going to win that fight! Finally, if you decide to take this all the way, you may want to consider moving to a different state and/or changing industries; because once the dust settles, you will be labeled as a troublemaker, and no employer in NWA (or possibly beyond) will touch you with a 9 foot pole. Just some things to consider in this awesome world we live in!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @4xre+Pp0cytY

3fla,

Some people appear to be so angry that they're willing to try anyways. That's what happens when people have very little to lose.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @4dll+Pp0cytY

I hope none of you are staking your future, your family's welfare or your children's welfare on the fact that you might even have a smidgen of a chance with any kind of lawsuit.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @4vkx+Pp0cytY

I never knew anyone had won a lawsuit against Walmart about age. Not even sure how they proved that.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @3fla+Pp0cytY

All it takes is a google search to see how many times Walmart has been taken to court for age discrimination. Some lost, some won.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2imu+Pp0cytY

It was just a matter of time before this happened. Won't be hard to find witnesses either, given how many people Walmart has fired recently.

It will be interesting to see if a court thinks Walmart is guilty of age discrimination. Who knows, right?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2ugj+Pp0cytY

@1xvd

Maybe so. Maybe I should’ve just uprooted my family taken them somewhere new, started all over again. And then maybe again. And again. Perhaps you don’t have a spouse and children(s) you’re responsible for raising. Maybe you do. But I sure a hell am not going to run from a fight. Relocate from a location that has my family name tied to it - a lot longer than the Waltons, the McMillions, the Glasses, and the cohorts of dismay and pain they’ve brought to my home town and state and country.

No, I’ll fight. Probably lose. But will stand up for myself and my family. Screw the quitting. And they can run through all the money they want defending themselves. I’m sure all the political knee-benders are in the side of Walmart. I don’t care. That’s why the federal government and/or an attorney with salt uses something called change of venue. No home court advantage.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2mld+Pp0cytY

All it takes is one Judge, and not in Northwest Arkansas to determine there is a case for Class Action Status to be heard. Then it's up to the Jury. I don't really care if the Lawyers get rich. It's not about the money for the people who sign the class action petition to be heard. It's about showing Walmart that they are not above the law. And to let the Executives know that were disgusted by watching them stand behind the Culture meeting after meeting like it ever meant anything to them.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1fou+Pp0cytY

I personally would love to see Walmart enjoined in a unfair labor practice or discrimination lawsuit, but, that is never going to happen. They can let you go for any reason or for no reason. I don't think they are worried. And if you're stupid enough to live in NWA where Walmart owns all the judges and politicians, then who is the one that fu**ed up? Maybe you should take some responsibility for your own future, move away and find anther job. Maybe you should have done this ten years ago.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1xvd+Pp0cytY

Walmart being Walmart has every angle covered. They have a large legal dept that have gone over every move with that fine tooth comb. No one will ever see a dime if that's the goal. Walmart always wins. Hopefully the day will come when the top dogs get what's well deserved,

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1ila+Pp0cytY

Many forms of discrimination and abuse...http://www.businessinsider.com/advocacy-group-report-walmart-punishes-employees-sick-days-2017-6

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1xes+Pp0cytY

You are so correct. My Wife and I were both displaced for no reason. No performance coaching, good reviews. They called it realignment and job elimination. Someone I worked with in the department said that leadership waited until everyone had signed their severance and then replaced everyone with people in their 20's and 30's.

I heard from a friend of mine who recently attended a Walmart Town Hall that one of the presenters asked how many people in the packed Home Office Auditorium had kids going back to college, and no one raised their hand. It's because no one in the room was old enough to have kids in college.

We have retained an attorney who is working with a class action Law Firm from Denver. We need to lower the legal hammer on these greedy Executives and nail them with an age discrimination Class Action Lawsuit.

It's not just age. It's people with disabilities too. There never used to be available Handicapped Parking spots but drive past the Home Office and you'll see there are plenty of them available. Why? Because they got rid of people who don't look like the people who sit on Executive Row. They let people go who were on protective FMLA Leave too. People recovering from Cancer, or injured on the job. Evil Corporate America. Congratulations Mr. CEO. You're going to go down in History as the Man who killed Walmart. I'm sure you'll sleep just fine with your millions in the bank.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @asm+Pp0cytY

Post a reply

: