Hmmmmm. . .so IBM choosing to highlight the plight of 30 illegals rather than the woeful and miserable plights they've perpetrated over the decades upon the thousands of loyal American citizen IBM'ers that they've callously RA'd is not surprising anymore in the least. At least these 30 illegals are still employed, at least for now, until they too are eventually RA'd. . .
http://www.businessinsider.com/this-is-an-employee-ibm-is-fighting-to-keep-from-being-deported-2017-11
"You've got that wrong, if you rob a bank, do your children go to jail?"
what you do not understand is the way the laws are currently written if these people are given citizenship they then can turn around and partition to have family members come here and live, legally. The laws need to be changed so that can not happen.
So in your example it would be if you rob a bank your kids can get you out of jail and you get to keep the money.
"What's leading to its downfall is failure to enforce the law. "
Exactly. There's not a person in this administration that gives a hoot about the law, starting at the top. It's killing us.
What's leading to its downfall is failure to enforce the law. And failure to care about the failure to enforce the law.
Unless you're native Americans, it's a good thing nobody said that about your ancestors when they came here. The US was built on their genocide and on the backs of slaves and immigrants. Ironic that hate for "people who aren't like us" is leading to its downfall.
Deportation Now!
You've got that wrong, if you rob a bank, do your children go to jail?
Illegal aliens push wages down, so of course IBM is 100% in favor of illegal immigration. What I don't understand is why so many US citizens support DACA and dismiss the flagrant violation of US law that DACA is and represents. If I rob a bank, do my children get to keep the money? Don't think so. The DACAs need to go to their countries. If IBM wants to keep them, IBM can transfer these 30 to Mexico, China, wherever they belong. They'll do great there, because they've had educations at U.S. taxpayer expense.