Thread regarding Qualcomm Inc. layoffs

Major flaw in Qualcomm as an organization

Here lies a major flaw in Qualcomm as an organization: we are so enamored with an engineer’s technical abilities that we conflate the ability to execute with the ability to lead. We keep promoting folks to management roles who can get a task done, but who are also woefully inadequate in terms of vision and direction. As a result, these folks do get great execution with excellent JIRA tracking on their plans with awesome breakdown on Epics, Stories, Tasks and Subtasks along with dependencies and schedules all laid out cleanly. But their plans get us nowhere because they lack one essential element—-vision. Far too many of our directors, senior directors, VPs, SVPs are just that—only great at execution, but they have zero vision, and zero ability to chart a correct new course. They have a facade of the ability to lead, but once you scratch the surface to open, there is nothing inside that can lead.

This was posted by @RXwAq7C-qxn as a reply in another thread, but it really deserves to be on the front page. Hit the nail on the head. Hope the OP does not mind the bump.

by
| 1840 views | | 4 replies (last ) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+RXM9lOI

4 replies (most recent on top)

NJRC has a senior director with no reports. Perhaps 10+ directors in a staff of < 300.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ewf+RXM9lOI

In total around 914

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @vaw+RXM9lOI

Nicely put.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @mga+RXM9lOI

Excellent post. This is perhaps very true , given that the ball is been gathering dirt for many many years.

company of this size should have ~150 directors [ ~200 per director to manage ] and 30 VP's. If there are any more than this, someone/Many is/are not not doing work and having fun!

Simple math.

How many directors /VP do you guys have?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @sph+RXM9lOI

Post a reply

: