Thread regarding Thomson Reuters layoffs

My department spent millions of dollars on hiring consultants from BJSS.

My department spent millions of dollars on hiring consultants from BJSS. what they are doing is making thing more complicated, wasting money, and no productivity or business value at all, and BJSS team pretend to very busy to organizing all kinds of nonsense meetings, wasting time.

Firing BJSS will save millions of dollars. Keep the employee who are really hands on doing work. the truth is, once there's a meeting, 2 or 3 people doing the actual work, 6 or 7 so called management team members are standing there, talking b---s--- to prove their existence and gaining some visibility. What a joke!

also, my department has too many so called architects, who are talking about 'big words' everyday, but has no ability to solve any actual problems; every bottom productive employee dislike these architects, but what can they do? those bottom productive employee are real assets of F&R.

blackstone, as what other posts said, don't layoff people based on feedback from F&R management team who are bureaucratic and ineffective team.

blackstone, please be down to the earth, listening the voice of bottom employee who are really contributing for the company.

by
| 2278 views | | 1 reply (last ) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+RZkyg3O

1 reply

BJSS are just one of many consultants TR gets in , this is no surprise.

i have worked with BJSS and the people I have worked with have been good, This issue is why TR is not using it's own staff ? they don't need to pay Consultant (not even contract) rates for Project managers etc. There are loads of PM's in TR (some good, but many are average) and when you look at the ratio of projects and PM's it doesn't stack up. There seems to be this miss conception in TR that every piece of work requires a project manager., which is why you end up with 100's of PM's.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @7ixs+RZkyg3O

Post a reply

: