Thread regarding State Farm Insurance layoffs

FMLA/sick leave retaliation and Benefits Taken Away class action lawsuit interest?

In lead up to claims offices closures people using FMLA and extended sick leave were set up for failure and eliminated by being given huge inventories all at once, hundreds of files at once, with insufficient time to review, then put on new assignments. They were meant to be punished and eliminated.

We have seen taken away our PV, PSL and PSL109 in Sept 2016 - a benefit promised to us all when we were hired. Now, replaced with PTO and point system with time clock and T2 you could quickly run into 8-16-20 points with a few illnesses. We have crowded cubicle conditions and coworkers coming to work sick. You hear the coughing then see the people getting sick row by row. Then they can get rid of you if they want.

They have layered the strategy to be able to get people out the door and avoid large severance exposures for last several years.

Unethical.

FMLA retaliation is illegal. Not sure how many are out there that went through this. Off top of head can think of 5-6 in my work area.

Their overall plan and behavior appears to have malicious intent to get rid of people who would get larger severance and more pension by office closures. Every month sooner is pension and benefits savings for company.

Claims Managers and Section Managers carrying out plan get offers of basically 2-3 years of pay plus retirement (if they are old enough, which most of them are).

The coming waves of actual closings will ultimately tell the story of what they do with each of the thousands of employees.

by
| 4023 views | | 10 replies (last ) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+Rs6a40Z

10 replies (most recent on top)

I am surprised that there hasn’t been a lawsuit filed in Claims with the the unrealistic metrics and micromanaging. There are so many people that are out on leave because of stress and anxiety. Management doesn’t seem to care

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @bvzpe+Rs6a40Z

They took away sick time. Replaced with PTO. Now starting Januray 1, 2020 given 5 days to use for own sick, doctor, dental, or a sick parent or child. Guess the lawsuit did some good. State Farm has their own legal department, sounds like they did not do their research before screwing their employees.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @buhha+Rs6a40Z

If your a PTO is deemed FMLA protected, the points roll off

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @15lcm+Rs6a40Z

EEOC claim mailed in re age discrimination, retaliation, hostile work environment, etc. I decided to speak up about unethical and probably illegal treatment I experienced.

Encouraging all experiencing discrimination to file EEOC claim.

You can set up in their system and get an appointment that is months away to then file your claim and or mail in your claim request per their website. EEOC is federal government and in many states your filed claim with EEOC also handle state investigation.

They will review and determine if they will investigate and if they do they will interview employees and request documents and seek remedial corrections, etc.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @12pvl+Rs6a40Z

If you have evidence that State Farm is retaliating against people or using FMLA, take them to court.

I wish you luck.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @Zajj+Rs6a40Z

This original statement is true. They are definitely attacking anybody who takes FMLA...and that includes people who took it because of a dying child or spouse. Or for an illness or injury caused by work or work related stress. I have seen awesome and productive employees targeted over those who (not joking) spend the day talking and have even violated the COC. I can only assume that those targeted are on a spreadsheet which, of course, doesn’t reflect anything other than the FMLA time they took. Nothing else matters. Performance and knowledge doesn’t matter. And for those who took FMLA for a family member who died...well what can I say? The odds that this employee will need FMLA for the foreseeable future are slim. Yet, the company sees them as a risk so they are targeted. This company believes they are above the law or even common decency.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @Zdfy+Rs6a40Z

5 years of total time. It doesn’t have to be consecutive.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @alp+Rs6a40Z

Let’s say an employee gets laid off one year before turning 55, do they still receive their pension?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @kpj+Rs6a40Z

5 years

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @jgc+Rs6a40Z

At what age is SF employees considered vested?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @tkb+Rs6a40Z

Post a reply

: