Here is my husband's scenario. He was working for IBM at same client for almost 19 years. Over the past year the client spend has been getting lower and lower and the IBM resources working for the client have been dwindling. He held on as long as possible but in Dec he was told he had 2 months to find another role at another client or lose his job. In the process they made him sign a PIP form (Performance Improvement Form). Needless to say his rating and reviews have been great, so the only thing they could put as his improvement actions are:
-
Actively search for a new client (and check in with manager each week with progress on search)
-
Build skills that will make him more relevant as he looks for another client account
He did both and did get an offer to work at another IBM client. However, that client required government clearance and he waited for the clearance paperwork to arrive, but unfortunately his paperwork did not arrive before the PIP expired. So at 49 years old he was forced to separate from IBM and was given only 1 month severance because he was on a PIP.
Seems to me putting people on PIP just because there current client doesn't have enough funds is illegal and a way to cut IBM headcount with little legal recourse for the employee.
Anyone have thoughts on this.