I was let go late last year, however there were no investigators. I was placed on leave by my manager and told I was part of an internal investigation and would be contacted by HR shortly. My manager called me several days later and stated “the firm has made a decision to separate.” But couldn’t provide additional details. It wasn’t apparent to me that it was due to the reimbursement until I received a copy of my u4. My U5 even states I wasn’t under investigation. So how did they conclude there was any wrongdoing of there wasn’t even an investigation?
3 replies (most recent on top)
You probably were not under investigation, since they concluded the investigation was complete. They probably don't have to interview you.
Sounds a tad sketchy. Feels like you or Fidelity is holding out on some information. I feel like they’d at least have to give you a reason.
Okay. Defend yourself. Did you file for a reimbursement and then return the equipment? If yes, then you got what you deserved. If no, what were the circumstances that made up the issue on your U4?