Thread regarding Cisco Systems Inc. layoffs

2 years after LR

Juat thought I would come back and share my experience. This is clearly one of the most active boards here, for obvioua reasons.

I was with Cisco for over 10 years. I have patents. I always made a positive impact. I moved on every 3 years to a new team and technology.

Eventually you find yourself in the wrong spot at the wrong time. In 2014 I easily found another internal job through networking, my new team got hammered in 2015, and in 2016 I no longer cared. It was clear whatever I did I had a target on me, even though I got accolades and constant incentive awards.

I left un early 2017 even with an offer to stay on.

Since then I have worked for 3 dfferent startups. Crazy I know. But the reason is that by being recruited I have ended up making 25% more than I did with Cisco. More importantly, I feel VALUED.

Having been wilth Cisco for long, and observing all the floatong dead wood, i kinda understand tje company's hostility towards old timers, but I think ita formulaic and lazy approach damn near criminally discriminatory.

But all is well. I feel vaued elsewhere, where within Cisco there is a feeling of justified existential angst.

It is also nice to work in a true growth industry again, rather than in one facing consolodation and contraction.

I have a soft spot for Cisco despite the laat few miserable years among constant whimsical layoffs. Anyone that claims thw layoffs are performance driven is an imbecile - I have seen brilliant distiguished engineers get laid off because they were innthe wrong team.

But this wlill be commonplace in the networkong industry in general.

Best luck and know the job market is pretty good out there now.

by
| 3001 views | | 4 replies (last ) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+X8xwqNy

4 replies (most recent on top)

Older employees get more done with less b.s. and are considered average.

Younger employees pull all nighters, make lots of noise - though they probably were a lot less productive than the older employees.

Who gets the credit? Youth, not experience. This is because Cisco is "management by escalation", and young people jump at escalations... experience addresses the issue before it's escalated.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @7gwj+X8xwqNy

I feel like a piece of human capital that is easily replaced by the next piece of human capital. Just feed for the meat grinder that is Cisco.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2xji+X8xwqNy

I felt less valued at my new company after Cisco. I ended up going BACK to Cisco as a contractor. I'm valued again, making more than I did as an employee of Cisco or my last employer.

It's all about the bottom line. Age usually equals experience & experience equals a demand for more pay, so companies want to replace older workers with younger, less experienced workers. Both are qualified to do the job, but sooner or later that younger worker will be more experienced and then the cycle begins again.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @hac+X8xwqNy

Wow super positive comment.! Hat down sir!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @yko+X8xwqNy

Post a reply

: