Thread regarding Union Pacific Corp. layoffs

Nothing You Do Matters

PSR is not a business model, it’s simply a hedge fund strategy. Regardless of what Lance, Vena, Foote, Kreel, or the deceased Hunter Harrison have said or will say. Hedge funds recognize inefficient companies and either take over the board or place tremendous pressure on the existing board to cut operating ratio and staff. This does two things creates billions of extra revenue and adds billions in stock value. Once the squeeze is running dry they sell and move on leaving the company surviving but not in a position for sustained long term growth.

Buffet always says “Run the company as it would look 100 years from now.” PSR “ Hedge Funding only focuses on net revenue produced from quarter to quarter. This is why Hunter Harrison skipped from company to company. PSR is not sustainable long term and in 8 to 16 financial reporting quarters it will end, Union Pacifc will rebuild.

Anyone that is left that wants to stay needs to not do anything to give them a reason to make you a casualty, agreement employees sometimes will not have a choice, but you will be called back eventually. Non agreement need to be PSR cheer leaders and put forward a try anything attitude even if Vena, Lischer, or Keller have the dumbest ideas on the planet. This will pass and we will survive, in some cases nothing you do will matter so hang in there

by
| 1854 views | | 10 replies (last ) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+XFmt2I2

10 replies (most recent on top)

BNSF today is the Toyota of 1978 and UP today is turning into the Chrysler of 1978. Long term view and sticking to fundamentals versus short term quarterly numbers and greed.

I wondered if they taught Lance leadership and ethics at the Kellogg School of Management, but now I’m wondering if they even taught management ....

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @pqk+XFmt2I2

An articulate and well thought out comment.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @kxt+XFmt2I2

I’ve have spent the last 40 years of my live laboring for UP. I used to be proud saying I work for Unionpacific. Now for some reason I’m embarrassed to say that. It’s the way they stated treating their employees. Like disposable trash.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @zli+XFmt2I2

GET OUT NOW

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @hsz+XFmt2I2

Call me! Please help me get out of this misery

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ztd+XFmt2I2

Well said. But, this will damage up to the point its existince may disappear in omaha, or be totally bought by blackrock.

In the meantime, the nepotists line thier pockets.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ljd+XFmt2I2

BNSF's significantly higher carloads are because of two key factors: different sales strategies and financial strategies.

BNSF's sales strategy is one of "we'll move anything", whereas UP's strategy is "we'll move anything if the price is right". UP positioned themselves as a "premium, niche" railroad. Kind of a walmart vs. target scenario. UP is Target, a supposedly higher quality, more premium customer experience, with a higher price to match. UP did that because we don't want to move everything out there. We only want to move loads for customers who are willing to pay top dollar. Why? Because UP doesn't have capacity to move every load out there. Why? Because UP doesn't like to spend money on capital expansion in order to modernize and maximize our facilities, equipment, etc. Look at our facilities compared to every other railroad in the US and Canada, we are sooo behind. Same with our rail equipment. We HATE spending capital money because it doesn't immediately translate into higher stock price. We'd rather pump our free cashflows into dividends and stock buybacks to please Wall St and make sure the execs stock value grows. Meanwhile, BNSF is pumping their money directly back into their network to expand capacity, which positions them to be able to grow volumes long term.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @vye+XFmt2I2

BNSF car loadings 266,000

Union Pacific car loadings 166,000

Last time I checked.

While I realize this isn't true indicator of value, that big of gap in itself should give the higher ups some kind of pause. Unless there is more behind this

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @fqb+XFmt2I2

I needed to hear this, honestly, thank you. I’m probably not going to be around after the next round of cuts but am optimistic I’ll be called back eventually. I’m still dumbfounded that a company who continually makes record profits resorted to such drastic changes and ruined many lives.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @mcs+XFmt2I2

Well said.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @mqf+XFmt2I2

Post a reply

: