Thread regarding Sears layoffs

Ex-Sears CEO Alan Lacy: Embattled chain probably won't survive if retail bankruptcy history is any guide

Lacy criticized Sears' stock buybacks before and during the 2008 financial crisis, saying the money should have gone into the business.

The odds are stacked against billionaire investor Eddie Lampert and his $5 billion-plus effort to resurrect Sears from bankruptcy, former Sears Chairman and CEO Alan Lacy told CNBC Thursday.

"Obviously, many people have said it, it's doubtful and unlikely that a retailer that goes into a Chapter 11 process comes out of it and stays out of it," he said on "Squawk on the Street." "It's rare that that's happened in retail bankruptcy history."

Once the largest retailer in the country, Sears has bled revenue and mounted debt for years, eventually running out of enough steam to cover a $134 million payment. Sears filed for bankruptcy last October after years of store closures. It's by far the largest of dozens of retailers to file bankruptcy since 2017, including liquidation of the iconic Toys R Us chain and department store Bon-Ton.

Lampert, who was once dubbed the "next Warren Buffett," stepped down as CEO of Sears Holdings Corp., the company behind the Sears and Kmart brands, after the bankruptcy. But he remained chairman.

Earlier this month, Lampert and his hedge fund won a $5.2 billion bid to buy the historic brand out of bankruptcy. Unsecured creditors are objecting to the deal and placing blame on Lampert, the hedge fund, and others for misconduct that they think played a large role in the chain's downfall. A U.S. bankruptcy judge is scheduled to consider ESL Investments' deal on Feb. 1 and, if approved, could save 400 stores and 45,000 jobs.

Lacy criticized the Sears stock buyback strategy before and during the 2008 financial crisis. From 2005 to 2011, the retailer spend about $6 billion to repurchase shares. He said the money should have been put back into the business.

However, Lacy said it was the Great Recession that really put the "nail in the coffin for this opportunity and that's obviously largely unrelated to Eddie's management style or anything." He added, "That was just a hugely impactful negative event, particularly for the Sears franchise which is much more correlated to housing turnover than anything else in the economy."

Yet, there is some hope that the 125-year-old department store chain could adapt to the retail landscape. But the company has a long ways to catch up as its hard to invest in online shopping since it hasn't turned a profit since 2010.

"It's possible, in my view, that [Sears] winds up with a going concern that's basically based online" because more stores could close post-bankruptcy, Lacy said. "[Online] seems to be one area that Eddie has paid a lot of attention to, invested behind ... and stores that are left probably do have some retail value."

by
| 1083 views | | 10 replies (last ) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+Xhp6Ubz

10 replies (most recent on top)

Well yes, Alan Lacy's taint could have done a better job running Sears than Eddie. Not exactly a high bar to cross.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1zhw+Xhp6Ubz

Lacy superior. Lampert inferior.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1mdk+Xhp6Ubz

Eddie was the wheelman at this great heist

Went away very quietly after he followed the suggestion of a certain crooked vulture capatalist. And very rich.

Just my humble opinion

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1pvd+Xhp6Ubz

F--- Alan Lacy.

He is the one that set everything up from the start. I blame him more than Eddie. All Eddie did was take what was basically handed to him on a silver platter.

Lacy set that sh-- up because he's a dic---ad and was looking to make himself rich and f--- over everyone that worked at Sears.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1guo+Xhp6Ubz

Alan Lacy was 10000x smarter as a retailer than Eddie.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1mra+Xhp6Ubz

"From 2005 to 2011, the retailer spend about $6 billion to repurchase shares. He said the money should have been put back into the business."

Truer words were never spoken. Lacy might not have been the most competent guy either, but he's totally right about this

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1ybs+Xhp6Ubz

Finally @bda someone else sees Lacy as the joke that he is. And the rest of you want to beat up on Eddie nonstop. Lacy started this whole domino game. Was a terrible CEO when he was running the ship. Not a retailer or a merchant either. A c-gare--e guy who swooped his way in to the Sears Credit kingmaking machine. Impressed (another outsider) Martinez who also didn’t know what he was doing or what Sears was. Alas...

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1cvt+Xhp6Ubz

Of course he would say this. He’s made money off the deal, twice. First when he led the merged monster, then when he moved to Dave & Buster’s and apparently led the charge to make deals with SRG. He conveniently left D&B after the last of those deals was completed last year. He wants the attention off him and his incompetence as CEO, and his profiteering while on the board at D&B. He wants the spotlight on Eddie to save himself.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1bda+Xhp6Ubz

Lacy is part of the problem. His due diligence sold sears out to Lampert!!! He was mid managing the retailer when he was in charge totally missing the boat on the internet and investing heavily in failed spur concepts such as Sears Grand all while selling out credit. Yeesh!!!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ibx+Xhp6Ubz

My hero and his too .

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @dqs+Xhp6Ubz

Post a reply

: