Thread regarding Sears layoffs

Even Senator Elizabeth Warren is going after Eddie. This will get interesting.

Elizabeth Warren wants a Valentine’s Day present from billionaire businessman Eddie Lampert.

The Massachusetts senator and presidential candidate sent a scathing letter to the hedge fund mogul on Thursday demanding that he answer eight questions by Feb. 14 about his plan to buy Sears out of bankruptcy.

In the Jan. 30 letter, Warren calls Lampert a “practitioner of predatory capitalism” and questions his motive for buying the very retail chain that fell into bankruptcy under his leadership.

Lampert’s hedge fund ESL Investment recently won an auction to acquire the bankrupt retailer for $5.2 billion. A sales hearing will be held on Feb. 4.

“Simply put, it appears that you have enriched yourself while driving the company into bankruptcy” she wrote, adding that she is concerned that Sears will continue to “struggle” under Lampert’s direction.

Warren is asking Lampert, among other things, to provide “specific details” about his long term plans, to explain how he’ll protect workers’ pensions and severance, and to explain how he will avoid conflicts of interest moving forward.

The letter comes as workers from Sears, Kmart and Toys R Us faced frigid temperatures on Thursday to draw attention to Warren’s letter at a Manhattan Kmart. The workers, organized by labor group United for Respect, are advocating for severance pay for laid off retail workers.

“The letter by Senator Warren to Mr. Lampert is extraordinary and purely political; she cannot compel ESL to do anything,” bankruptcy attorney David Wander told The Post.

The letter does, however, give “ammunition” to creditors opposing Lampert’s bid ahead of next week’s sales hearing, Wander added.

by
| 1311 views | | 10 replies (last ) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+Xpcu0WR

10 replies (most recent on top)

I think we all agree Eddie is a scumbag, or at best a terrible retailer. LOL

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2gjp+Xpcu0WR

Beyond all of the political responses. What Eddie Lambert has done is outrageous.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2cqx+Xpcu0WR

Those who can, do. Those who can’t, teach. The difference between a legal scholar and an appellate judge is that an appellatw judge’s opinion matters.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1tsb+Xpcu0WR

No she has no standing or authority and it's definitely political but she does know bankruptcy law. If she had come on board with this a few years ago, even around the time of the craftsman deal, maybe something would be different today. Although Eddie doesn't seem to mind bad press and that's all he would have gotten. More bad press.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1dop+Xpcu0WR

She has no standing or authority in the case. Whether or not she went to Harvard. These kind of stunts only serve to make her look silly and opportunistic. An empty gesture.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1jzd+Xpcu0WR

She is a specialist in bankruptcy law. That is what she researched and taught at Harvard. You might not like her and she might be coming at this too late but her questions are reasonable.

She probably wasn't thinking about Sears until the bankruptcy and then the highly irregular actions of Lampert that received a fresh round of press coverage. Most of us on here wouldn't be thinking too often about Sears if we hadn't worked there or work there still.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1ptx+Xpcu0WR

She is one of the double tongues.

There is no iron in her words.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @dey+Xpcu0WR

How is Warren qualified to question Eddie? Is she a superior retail operator or is she a socialist leaning politician?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @xli+Xpcu0WR

This is a study of capitalism vs. socialism.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ksu+Xpcu0WR

She really doesn’t want the creditors to win on her letter. If they do, she’s going to be blamed for killing 45k jobs and her campiagn will be over before it begins.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @yab+Xpcu0WR

Post a reply

: