Thread regarding Union Pacific Corp. layoffs

How are cuts determined?

I can't speak to Union. I am not familiar enough, but I imagine similar b.s.

At least during this round of cuts,

Is it who you know?

Is it who you nodded your head yes to?

Is it how much you make ?

Is it how how much seniority you have?

Is it how many do the same thing you do?

Or is it How good you are at your job for what you are paid and how you get along with others and if the job is necessary. .. . .

Management? Care to share how you decided? I'm sure it was logical .

by
| 1270 views | | 5 replies (last ) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+XwdczWf

5 replies (most recent on top)

These id--ts probably ask the Magic 8 ball

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1gti+XwdczWf

And the wolf went around and around devouring all that it could to fulfill it’s hunger until finally, there was nothing left and it died. Farewell Union Pacific. You were once a great icon.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @qva+XwdczWf

Ironic you use the family analogy. Because i dont see anybodies wifes, sons, daughter in laws getting let go.

There are still so many certified "bad" employees walking around upc, it only leads to more instability. But hey up, you still be up.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @euc+XwdczWf

So stupid it has to be that way during record profits...

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @wtq+XwdczWf

All of the above, and a few more. People make those calls so it differs case by case. Some groups may be culled root and stem ordered from above like closing a whole shop. Other orders may come down asking that a list be gathered of weakest links understanding a certain % of all workers need to be on that list or your name may be on your supervisors list next. They want G55, that should be obvious, it was never any joke. What every needs done forward to get to that, that is what is expected decided by C-level and any below. It is a C-level commandment down, management at any lower level doesn't decide per-say. They do what demanded next or understand they themselves viewed the weakest link higher up the chain. "pick between your children, sometimes disavow that whole large group of your family" It is like that. No one is enjoying it trust you me. It is like dissection of your known family, one small cut at a time, next round rules change, till we reach G55 targets. That bad guy, that bad. There a reason you see people like Tennison suddenly reevaluate and just walk away from it all. It is a relief mechanism to distance from what must be done forward to continue on. It is not an easy work, there simply is no choice till you walk away too ending your own ordeal.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @vmy+XwdczWf

Post a reply

: