Thread regarding IBM layoffs

As long as there are worker bees there can be layoffs

IBM has historically had a 10-1 worker bee to manger ratio. If you drop that down to 5-1 you are still looking at 250-280k worth of worker bees. So there are plenty of places to cut. It’s all about profits, margins, and getting paid without having to invest in feet on the street (IP and patents). IBM discovered that they could off load a large part of their marketing to the channel and save money (you only pay the channel when it sells). Now ask yourself how do you do the same thing in services? Automation, offshoring, IP, patents, and joint ventures come to mind. There are a pile of bean counters right now in IBM doing the spread sheets to decide who it makes sense to replace via alternative go to market strategies. Redhat wasn't Bought for its financial spreadsheet, but rather for its exclusive monopoly power that it delivers vs other LINUX distributors Whether that monopoly power can be exploited is still a work in progress

Sadly, @YIZApV0-1kbc is right. Thought this should be in a thread of its own.

by
| 1663 views | | 8 replies (last ) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+YJQDhbK

8 replies (most recent on top)

Should you leave IBM and work for a decent company instead? Yes

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2ioj+YJQDhbK

Should I buy a car , not buy a car ? What about a house, school.. Hard way to live day to day working for IBM . Fact , they don’t care, your a number.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2kil+YJQDhbK

Something is boiling in the IBM Nordics.....

Direct questions regarding the future of a department are not answered.

Lower management is kept in the dark.

Higher management first wants to have a talk over a coffee. But then after identifying the person that he/she is going to have a talk with. Completely turn dark.

No hard evidence but this smells like a new round of reorg.

"The transformation has started, and everyone will be part of it. "

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2bcy+YJQDhbK

You have the numbers wrong. Its 10 manager for each worker bee.

Get it right next time bluebird.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2qbq+YJQDhbK

Actually it's the opposite. Tons of managers are worried about span of control layoffs or their ranks.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1cht+YJQDhbK

This thread doesn’t have actual proof of layoffs in the works. Only assumptions and opinion. Show me some hard evidence.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @jdu+YJQDhbK

IBM patents?

One area that is working for IBM, and in a highly-profitable way, is collecting patents. IBM touts its "25 years of patent leadership," but others rightly warn that "A lot of the research that IBM conducts may not translate to immediate business gains." Amen to that. The immediate gains are patent royalties. In short, instead of selling technology based on patents, IBM increasingly resorts to selling access to the patents themselves. This is the wrong move. lol

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @aze+YJQDhbK

They can always dump all the innovation centers where the worker bees never bother showing up to anyway. It'd save a huge amount of cash and tax dollars. Only time will tell if they will brain up.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @qxu+YJQDhbK

Post a reply

: