Thread regarding Union Pacific Corp. layoffs

This post will be deleted asap.

Ok, i didnt want to say anything, but you guys seem really cool so here goes. Lance will be stepping down here at the end of June, take notice of how he will become more of a public figure in the weeks to come leading up to this. As many of you have speculated he is fishing for a career in politics. Vena will take over as CEO as a temporary position, when Blackrock Inc has sweated all the assets they can out of UP they will pay him his bounty, Vena will then go back to Cananda and fall off the grid for awhile.

Now the new CEO to replace him will come in with a campaign of promoting family values, safety, and putting employees before profits. He or she will have there work cut out for them trying to regain trust. I believe the new CEO will be female.

This news isnt coming from the top brass, or upper echelons, its coming from a voice in my head, but i can also see into the future.

by
| 1637 views | | 4 replies (last ) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+ZfVpK6a

4 replies (most recent on top)

Of all the posts that need deleting this is one of them

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2zwz+ZfVpK6a

At the time of this reply, the original post has been up for 21 hours.

There is no reason for lance to step down. Stock prices are up, operating costs are down, the P/E ratio (the one that actually means something, unlike the "g55+0" BS) is projected to remain favorable, and thanks to the layoffs there has been a significant reduction in labor costs.

In other words, Lance is delivering on exactly what was asked of him, and he's well-compensated for doing so. He will probably be there longer than you will.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1kvf+ZfVpK6a

Notice after the factual post about lances approval rating being in the gutter all the UP railbuff trolls came out with several nonsense posts to bury the legitimate story.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @phv+ZfVpK6a

Finally someone who makes sense of all this! About time. Thank you Melmac!!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @kka+ZfVpK6a

Post a reply

: