Thread regarding University of Phoenix layoffs

As most of you apparently have a hard time listening. The employees were not laid off due to lack of performance alone. Several top performers were also let go due to positions needing to be minimized. With the expansion of each division and separating B&T, health care, and education in most divisions then not having marketing techniques enough to fulfill the database of each EC that had been assigned to these teams caused an overload of EC to lead ratio when marketing slowed. Some of you have said that only poor performers were laid off which not entirely is true. Again on top of it a "poor performer" would be someone who had a lack of enrollments maybe some did twiddle their thumbs but most may have been impacted heavily by overload of EC to lead ration and multiple full teams were incapable of meeting a matrix including teams completely full of executive EC's. If it were completely just poor performers who had two bad reviews in a row then how could an executive which many were lost be laid off and still had the title of executive. Again a matrix was only based on enrollments on the EC's part and no considerations would be made if a student for whatever reason could not attend over 5 weeks or 9 weeks depending on school, to include marketing, lead flow, and the fact that it is illegal to compensate an EC for enrollments.