Thread regarding Verizon Communications Inc. layoffs

Forget home garaging, why isn’t my CO getting any new techs?

by
| 1606 views | | 13 replies (last ) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1p9D7l2m

13 replies (most recent on top)

@4qpn+1p9D7l2m

This is the same person that was claiming he’s superior because of his genes. Seems like a bottom feeder.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @4gtq+1p9D7l2m

Post ID: @4wtg+1p9D7l2m

Are you stating that VZ is operating similarly to the pink wireless monster which is T-Mobile?

But the share prices are diametrically opposite - VZ's depressed versus moved/moving higher?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @4qpn+1p9D7l2m

Post ID: @2vqt+1p9D7l2m

It’s unfortunate to say but outsourcing has been the biggest issue for Verizon. The lies, lack of true empathy, and not understanding that American culture is results oriented is making Verizon no different than T Mobile.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @4wtg+1p9D7l2m

Post ID: @1dxy+1p9D7l2m

However, did you discern the ancillary, axiom, as to why the share price is and has been depressed?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2vqt+1p9D7l2m

@1iii+1p9D7l2m

"The bottom line is not the bottom line" sounds like some BS double speak.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1dxy+1p9D7l2m

They have been cheaping out on CO coverage for years and it is getting worse. Don't worry 5G will save you.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1iso+1p9D7l2m

Post ID: @1qhb+1p9D7l2m

The bottom line is not the bottom line.

The key metric is top line revenue growth which comes down to price and customer service, which both are union related.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1iii+1p9D7l2m

In regards to 1lvs+1p9D7l2m's comment. He/she is wrong in blaming the union for VZ to be able to price competively. The no layoff clause was negotiated by the higher ups for only one reason. They needed the union working . If they they didn't they would not have signed off on it , nothing magical or sinister about it, just the fact. Upper management 's hands are are anything but tied. There is much they can do to improve profitability. A start would be to begin trimming the fat on the management and non-union side of the company. There is much waste such as redundant jobs, unneeded management levels, stores with little to no traffic, unproductive
work from homers, underutilized real estate, etc. This would only scratch the surface of the problem. An effort eliminate much of this waste it would greatly improve the VZ's bottom line as the capital saved can be used to further build out the infrastructure needed for the company to grow and thrive. It seems that ignorance is rampant on the board.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1qhb+1p9D7l2m

In all fairness, there’s tons of work in FiOS.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1kei+1p9D7l2m

VZ's employees being unionized members have no work and still have jobs.

VZ's Union: NO LAYOFF CLAUSE!!!!!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1fnb+1p9D7l2m

go ask the listed Union Representative being paid a $100k to lend answers. Why ask here as if anyone blogging here care what happens with the union jobs.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1nfe+1p9D7l2m

Really, again, union asking unthinkable questions just to be sarcastic? Boneheaded. This is a layoff site as you well know.

VZ's management employees are facing a 3k so 3,000 employees to be unemployment this time next week and will be served notices.

And the union wants to play stupid and ask questions as it VZ is going to hire any more unionized technicians. Be grateful for what you have because for one (1) reason, its the union is why VZ cannot drop prices to be competitive. Union: NO LAYOFF CLAUSE!!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1lvs+1p9D7l2m

Do you have Fios? If not new techs will be hired once Brightspeed buys your area.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1kqc+1p9D7l2m

Post a reply

: