Thread regarding Global Payments Inc. layoffs

Leveraged Buyout

If you want to know why the company is doing what it is doing, here’s a small lesson in Private Equity and Leveraged Buyouts. Basically, a larger company finds a smaller healthy company that has employees that they are paying well and has invested a lot of money in research and development. They buy that company with debt, fire the workers, disband R&D and offload debt. They then use all the money doing that generates to pay themselves. This has been an ongoing trend the last 20 years and has ramped up in the last 10. This is in turn destroying the working class by making all these companies like zombie versions of themselves.

In the 1970’s when THEY DEREGULATED THE STOCK MARKET AND THE FINANCE INDUSTRY, PRODUCTIVITY DIVERGED FROM WAGES. If we were to bring back the New Deal Reforms from the 50s/60s, we would close the gap of productivity & wages, and it would make normal people wealthier as opposed to bankers and financiers.


by
| 3526 views | | 19 replies (last ) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1kw2tv79w

19 replies (most recent on top)

@yw just gonna make sh-t up, huh? Everyone is already worried enough, so this comment makes you an a--hole

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @10h+1kw2tv79w

@cz if you are US based and an FTE you are on the list

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @yw+1kw2tv79w

@ts what part of the company?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @w8+1kw2tv79w

Execs will be enjoying the fourth on their respective boats while others will be trying to put on a good face for their families knowing what’s happening. American spirit.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @tw+1kw2tv79w

Well happy Tuesday. Today my manager finally gave me some insight and suggested I bring home some of my belongings. Writings on the wall peeps. I will apparently have official notice next week.

Thanks for ruining the weekend a--holes.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ts+1kw2tv79w

@qa Believe me. We all knew it was all bull. Troy Woods sold us out to line his pockets. Merger of equals. Right.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @r5+1kw2tv79w

@ah
That's exactly what they said about TSYS when GP acquired TSYS. Keep a bunch of the acquired org senior leadership so as not to frighten the TSYS chickens while they decided what to services to keep, get rid of the existing GP management that (as they see it) are too disruptive, told us the the way TSYS managed it staff was better so they are doing the same. Gave TSYS people a false sense of security, when all along they Just wanted Sierra/TSYS Merchant customers. Off loaded Issuing as soon as they could get away with, as they could not asset strip that in the same why they have done with other acquired customer.

It was all a load of bull ... this is too.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @qa+1kw2tv79w

@ey fair point, but it’s been that way well before the headcounts have been cut.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ez+1kw2tv79w

@cw …or maybe no one has time to document anything because of how lean they are. That’s certainly what I’m seeing. You cut heads then something has to give.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ey+1kw2tv79w

@cw That was supposed to be one of the main purposes of the Transformation, but none of our systems were actually consolidated. Not sure what McKinsey actually did other than cause waves for two years.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @dd+1kw2tv79w

If you are having new faces physically come to your office next week you are on the chopping block. If you work in developement and are not in an office or do not love over seas youare on the chopping block. If you are a csm or support leader based in the U.S you are on the chopping block. If you are considered operations and U.S based. You have been on the chopping block and will continue to be. IC classified employees, training, repair technicians are in this round as well. Many cuts are being made based on salaries. If you make above 85k or have bonuses, you are on the block. Good luck to all of us over this next week.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @cz+1kw2tv79w

@bb multiple efforts are underway to finally combine and demise many legacy systems——the problem always ends up being that the experts of the system have no documented procedures and hoard the institutional knowledge for nothing else besides their own job security.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @cw+1kw2tv79w

@am It is. I'm part of a team which was originally part of a company bought out by TSYS. Our team is now very small due to people leaving and their roles not being backfilled, and we've been fully remote since the start of the COVID outbreak.

We're officially Global Payments employees, but it feels more like a "ghost team" of sorts. Our manager is based in a different city. No one provides us with any process updates. I can't really remember the last time we had a team meeting. We have little to no contact with any people outside of our own team. I do kind of enjoy if personally, because when a corporation operates this poorly I prefer to simply be left alone, but I also recognize that it's one of many very obvious signs of the widespread dysfunction within the organization. The left hand doesn't know what the right hand is doing.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @c7+1kw2tv79w

@av It's hard not to when all of the systems used by the legacy companies don't 'touch'. It's like asking why an anglerfish doesn't consider itself a bird. It's never seen the sky, and the birds have never been to the depths. GP hasn't really invested anything into making services mesh, they just kind of absorbed those businesses and systems to cut down on competitors and funnel profits derived from them up to the GP C-suite. If customers get mixed up between services, everyone's fu---d... which is honestly why the "everything is being called GP now despite being still COMPLETELY seperated" isn't helping.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @bb+1kw2tv79w

@am it does seem dysfunctional doesn’t it? Unfortunately it’s true. Heartland folks still look at themselves as Heartland.TSYS is the same. The list goes on with the smaller ones.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @av+1kw2tv79w

@ah I could not believe that GP had basically no consolidation efforts and operated as an umbrella with all their acquisitions. Seems insanely dysfunctional

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @am+1kw2tv79w

WP people know what they are doing and have a true culture. IMHO they are chosing WP over GP because the overall GP organization lacks cohesion, with teams operating in isolation under legacy frameworks and they are very resistant to changing or adapting.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ah+1kw2tv79w

Problem with your theory: the majority of layoffs are GP and GP owned subsidiaries. Majority of WP is staying intact and have taken over most (not all) senior leaderhip positions

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a5+1kw2tv79w

History repeats itself.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a3+1kw2tv79w

Post a reply

: